LAD
Price
$333.00
Change
-$6.30 (-1.86%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
8.08B
34 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PAG
Price
$163.44
Change
-$1.28 (-0.78%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
10.76B
27 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

LAD vs PAG

Header iconLAD vs PAG Comparison
Open Charts LAD vs PAGBanner chart's image
Lithia Motors
Price$333.00
Change-$6.30 (-1.86%)
Volume$185.61K
Capitalization8.08B
Penske Automotive Group
Price$163.44
Change-$1.28 (-0.78%)
Volume$175.87K
Capitalization10.76B
LAD vs PAG Comparison Chart in %
LAD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PAG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LAD vs. PAG commentary
Jan 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAD is a Hold and PAG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 15, 2026
Stock price -- (LAD: $333.00 vs. PAG: $163.44)
Brand notoriety: LAD and PAG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Automotive Aftermarket industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LAD: 69% vs. PAG: 75%
Market capitalization -- LAD: $8.08B vs. PAG: $10.76B
LAD [@Automotive Aftermarket] is valued at $8.08B. PAG’s [@Automotive Aftermarket] market capitalization is $10.76B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry ranges from $64.86B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry is $4.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LAD’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePAG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • LAD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PAG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PAG is a better buy in the long-term than LAD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LAD’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAG’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LAD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PAG’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PAG is a better buy in the short-term than LAD.

Price Growth

LAD (@Automotive Aftermarket) experienced а +1.76% price change this week, while PAG (@Automotive Aftermarket) price change was +1.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Automotive Aftermarket industry was +1.94%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.98%.

Reported Earning Dates

LAD is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2026.

PAG is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Automotive Aftermarket (+1.94% weekly)

The Automotive Aftermarket consists of the manufacturing, remanufacturing, distribution, retailing, and installation of vehicle parts and accessories, after the sale of the automobile by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to the consumer. The aftermarket parts many not be manufactured by the OEM. According to a Technavio study, the US automotive parts aftermarket size is estimated to grow by USD 24.33 billion during 2018-2022 (CAGR 3%). Like many other industries, the automotive aftermarket is also being intensely penetrated by the digital boom. The online auto parts sales market is predicted to exceed $13B by 2020 (according to a study by Mirakl).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAG($10.8B) has a higher market cap than LAD($8.08B). PAG has higher P/E ratio than LAD: PAG (11.51) vs LAD (9.62). PAG YTD gains are higher at: 3.254 vs. LAD (0.202). LAD has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.38B vs. PAG (1.71B). LAD has more cash in the bank: 417M vs. PAG (80.3M). PAG has less debt than LAD: PAG (7.93B) vs LAD (14.7B). LAD has higher revenues than PAG: LAD (37.6B) vs PAG (30.7B).
LADPAGLAD / PAG
Capitalization8.08B10.8B75%
EBITDA2.38B1.71B139%
Gain YTD0.2023.2546%
P/E Ratio9.6211.5184%
Revenue37.6B30.7B122%
Total Cash417M80.3M519%
Total Debt14.7B7.93B185%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LAD vs PAG: Fundamental Ratings
LAD
PAG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6056
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
62
Fair valued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8110
SMR RATING
1..100
5850
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5358
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7758
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9044

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PAG's Valuation (33) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as LAD (62). This means that PAG’s stock grew similarly to LAD’s over the last 12 months.

PAG's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the Specialty Stores industry is significantly better than the same rating for LAD (81). This means that PAG’s stock grew significantly faster than LAD’s over the last 12 months.

PAG's SMR Rating (50) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as LAD (58). This means that PAG’s stock grew similarly to LAD’s over the last 12 months.

LAD's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as PAG (58). This means that LAD’s stock grew similarly to PAG’s over the last 12 months.

PAG's P/E Growth Rating (58) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as LAD (77). This means that PAG’s stock grew similarly to LAD’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LADPAG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LAD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PAG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BSCZ20.900.04
+0.19%
Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corp Bd ETF
BLUX29.080.03
+0.10%
BLUEMONTE DYNAMIC TOTAL MARKET ETF
NYF53.880.04
+0.07%
iShares New York Muni Bond ETF
TOK140.55N/A
N/A
iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF
XFEB35.81-0.01
-0.03%
FT Vest US Eq Enh & Mod Buf ETF-Feb

LAD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LAD has been closely correlated with AN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LAD jumps, then AN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LAD
1D Price
Change %
LAD100%
-1.86%
AN - LAD
78%
Closely correlated
-0.80%
ABG - LAD
76%
Closely correlated
-0.01%
GPI - LAD
76%
Closely correlated
-0.22%
PAG - LAD
72%
Closely correlated
-0.78%
RUSHA - LAD
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.59%
More

PAG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAG has been closely correlated with GPI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAG jumps, then GPI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PAG
1D Price
Change %
PAG100%
-0.78%
GPI - PAG
85%
Closely correlated
-0.22%
AN - PAG
80%
Closely correlated
-0.80%
SAH - PAG
79%
Closely correlated
-0.24%
ABG - PAG
78%
Closely correlated
-0.01%
LAD - PAG
71%
Closely correlated
-1.86%
More