Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LACAX vs PMBMX
LACAX vs PMBMX Comparison
Open Charts LACAX vs PMBMX
LACAX vs PMBMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LACAX vs. PMBMX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LACAX is a Hold and PMBMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBMX has more cash in the bank: 29.5B vs. LACAX (2.52B). LACAX (0.00) and PMBMX (0.00) have matching dividends . LACAX was incepted earlier than PMBMX: LACAX (25 years) vs PMBMX (25 years). PMBMX (1.14) and LACAX (1.10) have similar cost to investors . LACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. PMBMX (13.70). PMBMX has a lower initial minimum investment than LACAX: PMBMX (0) vs LACAX (2000). LACAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.19 vs. PMBMX (-11.84). PMBMX return over 5 years is better than : 9.56 vs. LACAX (-30.80).
| LACAX | PMBMX | LACAX / PMBMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.14 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.14 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.922 | -2.987 | -165% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.52B | 29.5B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.19 | -11.84 | -69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.35 | 18.93 | 187% |
| Returns for 5 years | -30.80 | 9.56 | -322% |
| Returns for 10 years | -38.40 | 108.34 | -35% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers