Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LACAX vs PMBMX
LACAX vs PMBMX Comparison
Open Charts LACAX vs PMBMX
LACAX vs PMBMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LACAX vs. PMBMX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LACAX is a Buy and PMBMX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBMX has more cash in the bank: 33.2B vs. LACAX (2.49B). PMBMX pays higher dividends than LACAX: PMBMX (0.02) vs LACAX (0.00). LACAX was incepted earlier than PMBMX: LACAX (25 years) vs PMBMX (25 years). PMBMX (1.14) and LACAX (1.10) have similar cost to investors . LACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. PMBMX (10.50). PMBMX has a lower initial minimum investment than LACAX: PMBMX (0) vs LACAX (2000). PMBMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.04 vs. LACAX (6.19). PMBMX return over 5 years is better than : 52.44 vs. LACAX (-26.31).
| LACAX | PMBMX | LACAX / PMBMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.14 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.14 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.754 | 8.421 | -21% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.49B | 33.2B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.19 | 13.04 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.49 | 47.27 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | -26.31 | 52.44 | -50% |
| Returns for 10 years | -71.65 | 97.42 | -74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers