Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LACAX vs PMBMX
LACAX vs PMBMX Comparison
Open Charts LACAX vs PMBMX
LACAX vs PMBMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LACAX vs. PMBMX commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LACAX is a Hold and PMBMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBMX has more cash in the bank: 33B vs. LACAX (2.5B). PMBMX pays higher dividends than LACAX: PMBMX (0.02) vs LACAX (0.00). LACAX was incepted earlier than PMBMX: LACAX (25 years) vs PMBMX (25 years). PMBMX (1.14) and LACAX (1.10) have similar cost to investors . LACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. PMBMX (10.50). PMBMX has a lower initial minimum investment than LACAX: PMBMX (0) vs LACAX (2000). LACAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.78 vs. PMBMX (2.04). PMBMX return over 5 years is better than : 45.10 vs. LACAX (-25.73).
| LACAX | PMBMX | LACAX / PMBMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.14 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.14 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.456 | 5.190 | 47% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.5B | 33B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.78 | 2.04 | 234% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.72 | 54.05 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | -25.73 | 45.10 | -57% |
| Returns for 10 years | -67.40 | 112.56 | -60% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers