Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LACAX vs PMBMX
LACAX vs PMBMX Comparison
Open Charts LACAX vs PMBMX
LACAX vs PMBMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LACAX vs. PMBMX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LACAX is a Buy and PMBMX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBMX has more cash in the bank: 32.3B vs. LACAX (2.5B). PMBMX pays higher dividends than LACAX: PMBMX (0.02) vs LACAX (0.00). LACAX was incepted earlier than PMBMX: LACAX (25 years) vs PMBMX (25 years). PMBMX (1.14) and LACAX (1.10) have similar cost to investors . LACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. PMBMX (10.50). PMBMX has a lower initial minimum investment than LACAX: PMBMX (0) vs LACAX (2000). PMBMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.80 vs. LACAX (8.16). PMBMX return over 5 years is better than : 55.71 vs. LACAX (-24.79).
| LACAX | PMBMX | LACAX / PMBMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.14 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.14 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.339 | 6.854 | -34% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.5B | 32.3B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.16 | 14.80 | 55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.40 | 50.19 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | -24.79 | 55.71 | -44% |
| Returns for 10 years | -72.21 | 94.74 | -76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers