Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LACAX vs PEMGX
LACAX vs PEMGX Comparison
Open Charts LACAX vs PEMGX
LACAX vs PEMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LACAX vs. PEMGX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LACAX is a Buy and PEMGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PEMGX has more cash in the bank: 33.2B vs. LACAX (2.49B). LACAX (0.00) and PEMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . LACAX was incepted earlier than PEMGX: LACAX (25 years) vs PEMGX (20 years). LACAX (1.10) is less costly to investors than PEMGX (0.91). LACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. PEMGX (10.50). LACAX (6%) and PEMGX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. PEMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than LACAX: PEMGX (1000) vs LACAX (2000). PEMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.43 vs. LACAX (6.19). PEMGX return over 5 years is better than : 55.06 vs. LACAX (-26.31).
| LACAX | PEMGX | LACAX / PEMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.91 | 118% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.91 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.754 | 8.564 | -20% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 105% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.49B | 33.2B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.19 | 13.43 | 46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.49 | 48.78 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | -26.31 | 55.06 | -48% |
| Returns for 10 years | -71.65 | 103.87 | -69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers