LAC
Price
$4.60
Change
-$0.27 (-5.54%)
Updated
Nov 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.2B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WWR
Price
$1.01
Change
-$0.07 (-6.48%)
Updated
Nov 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
93.12M
Earnings call today
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

LAC vs WWR

Header iconLAC vs WWR Comparison
Open Charts LAC vs WWRBanner chart's image
Lithium Americas
Price$4.60
Change-$0.27 (-5.54%)
Volume$92.8K
Capitalization1.2B
Westwater Resources
Price$1.01
Change-$0.07 (-6.48%)
Volume$1.11K
Capitalization93.12M
LAC vs WWR Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LAC vs. WWR commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAC is a Hold and WWR is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (LAC: $4.87 vs. WWR: $1.08)
Brand notoriety: LAC and WWR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LAC: 23% vs. WWR: 18%
Market capitalization -- LAC: $1.14B vs. WWR: $87.09M
LAC [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $1.14B. WWR’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $87.09M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.68B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LAC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWWR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LAC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WWR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both LAC and WWR are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LAC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WWR’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LAC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • WWR’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 8 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LAC is a better buy in the short-term than WWR.

Price Growth

LAC (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +5.64% price change this week, while WWR (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -8.47% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +167.93%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.70% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LAC($1.2B) has a higher market cap than WWR($93.1M). LAC YTD gains are higher at: 63.973 vs. WWR (52.456). WWR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -11.42M vs. LAC (-53.54M). LAC has more cash in the bank: 509M vs. WWR (6.7M). WWR has less debt than LAC: WWR (5.17M) vs LAC (207M). LAC (0) and WWR (0) have equivalent revenues.
LACWWRLAC / WWR
Capitalization1.2B93.1M1,288%
EBITDA-53.54M-11.42M469%
Gain YTD63.97352.456122%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash509M6.7M7,592%
Total Debt207M5.17M4,005%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LAC vs WWR: Fundamental Ratings
LAC
WWR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5580
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
37
Fair valued
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9393
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4439
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WWR's Valuation (28) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is in the same range as LAC (37) in the null industry. This means that WWR’s stock grew similarly to LAC’s over the last 12 months.

WWR's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is in the same range as LAC (100) in the null industry. This means that WWR’s stock grew similarly to LAC’s over the last 12 months.

WWR's SMR Rating (93) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is in the same range as LAC (93) in the null industry. This means that WWR’s stock grew similarly to LAC’s over the last 12 months.

WWR's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is in the same range as LAC (44) in the null industry. This means that WWR’s stock grew similarly to LAC’s over the last 12 months.

WWR's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is in the same range as LAC (100) in the null industry. This means that WWR’s stock grew similarly to LAC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LACWWR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LAC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WWR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VIAAX44.480.37
+0.84%
Vanguard Intl Div Apprec Idx Adm
FMIUX37.650.18
+0.48%
FMI Common Stock Institutional
PNRCX50.850.24
+0.47%
PGIM Jennison Natural Resources C
TMCGX15.53-0.02
-0.13%
Thrivent Mid Cap Growth S
CFGRX58.25-0.12
-0.21%
Commerce Growth

LAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LAC has been loosely correlated with LAR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LAC jumps, then LAR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LAC
1D Price
Change %
LAC100%
-1.42%
LAR - LAC
54%
Loosely correlated
+2.95%
SLI - LAC
53%
Loosely correlated
+5.64%
SGML - LAC
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.34%
PMETF - LAC
42%
Loosely correlated
+5.53%
GLNCY - LAC
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.62%
More

WWR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WWR has been loosely correlated with LGO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WWR jumps, then LGO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WWR
1D Price
Change %
WWR100%
-0.92%
LGO - WWR
39%
Loosely correlated
-3.51%
NVA - WWR
38%
Loosely correlated
+11.63%
GTI - WWR
35%
Loosely correlated
-30.59%
CRML - WWR
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.61%
LAC - WWR
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.42%
More