LAC
Price
$2.89
Change
+$0.10 (+3.58%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
701.39M
SGML
Price
$6.43
Change
+$0.39 (+6.46%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
717.84M
68 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LAC vs SGML

Header iconLAC vs SGML Comparison
Open Charts LAC vs SGMLBanner chart's image
Lithium Americas
Price$2.89
Change+$0.10 (+3.58%)
Volume$5.93M
Capitalization701.39M
Sigma Lithium
Price$6.43
Change+$0.39 (+6.46%)
Volume$3.17M
Capitalization717.84M
LAC vs SGML Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SGML
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LAC vs. SGML commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAC is a StrongBuy and SGML is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (LAC: $2.89 vs. SGML: $6.43)
Brand notoriety: LAC and SGML are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LAC: 69% vs. SGML: 112%
Market capitalization -- LAC: $702.51M vs. SGML: $717.84M
LAC [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $702.51M. SGML’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $717.84M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LAC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSGML’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LAC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SGML’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both LAC and SGML are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LAC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SGML’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LAC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SGML’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SGML is a better buy in the short-term than LAC.

Price Growth

LAC (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -3.34% price change this week, while SGML (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -4.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +55.53%.

Reported Earning Dates

SGML is expected to report earnings on Nov 14, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.20% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SGML($718M) and LAC($701M) have the same market capitalization . LAC YTD gains are higher at: -2.694 vs. SGML (-42.692). SGML has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -16.61M vs. LAC (-53.54M). LAC has more cash in the bank: 509M vs. SGML (31.1M). SGML has less debt than LAC: SGML (172M) vs LAC (207M). SGML has higher revenues than LAC: SGML (127M) vs LAC (0).
LACSGMLLAC / SGML
Capitalization701M718M98%
EBITDA-53.54M-16.61M322%
Gain YTD-2.694-42.6926%
P/E RatioN/A120.72-
Revenue0127M-
Total Cash509M31.1M1,637%
Total Debt207M172M120%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LAC vs SGML: Fundamental Ratings
LAC
SGML
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1723
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
34
Fair valued
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10088
SMR RATING
1..100
9597
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5360
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10022
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a90

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LAC's Valuation (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SGML (89). This means that LAC’s stock grew somewhat faster than SGML’s over the last 12 months.

SGML's Profit vs Risk Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as LAC (100). This means that SGML’s stock grew similarly to LAC’s over the last 12 months.

LAC's SMR Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as SGML (97). This means that LAC’s stock grew similarly to SGML’s over the last 12 months.

LAC's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as SGML (60). This means that LAC’s stock grew similarly to SGML’s over the last 12 months.

SGML's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LAC (100). This means that SGML’s stock grew significantly faster than LAC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LACSGML
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SGML
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IHSIX23.500.06
+0.26%
Hartford Small Company I
ENPIX40.77N/A
N/A
ProFunds UltraSector Energy Investor
JOSSX54.11N/A
N/A
Johnson Opportunity S
AEYIX9.05N/A
N/A
American Century Equity Income C
FASPX48.34N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies M

LAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LAC has been loosely correlated with SGML. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LAC jumps, then SGML could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LAC
1D Price
Change %
LAC100%
+3.58%
SGML - LAC
52%
Loosely correlated
+6.46%
SLI - LAC
48%
Loosely correlated
+6.97%
TECK - LAC
47%
Loosely correlated
+4.70%
VALE - LAC
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.36%
RIO - LAC
45%
Loosely correlated
+2.42%
More

SGML and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SGML has been loosely correlated with LAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SGML jumps, then LAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SGML
1D Price
Change %
SGML100%
+6.46%
LAC - SGML
52%
Loosely correlated
+3.58%
VALE - SGML
47%
Loosely correlated
+1.36%
PLL - SGML
47%
Loosely correlated
N/A
TECK - SGML
45%
Loosely correlated
+4.70%
RIO - SGML
43%
Loosely correlated
+2.42%
More