LAC
Price
$6.33
Change
-$1.04 (-14.11%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
1.54B
SGML
Price
$7.03
Change
-$0.17 (-2.36%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
784.13M
48 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LAC vs SGML

Header iconLAC vs SGML Comparison
Open Charts LAC vs SGMLBanner chart's image
Lithium Americas
Price$6.33
Change-$1.04 (-14.11%)
Volume$85.06M
Capitalization1.54B
Sigma Lithium
Price$7.03
Change-$0.17 (-2.36%)
Volume$3.09M
Capitalization784.13M
LAC vs SGML Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SGML
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LAC vs. SGML commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAC is a Buy and SGML is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (LAC: $6.33 vs. SGML: $7.03)
Brand notoriety: LAC and SGML are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LAC: 413% vs. SGML: 112%
Market capitalization -- LAC: $1.54B vs. SGML: $784.13M
LAC [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $1.54B. SGML’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $784.13M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LAC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSGML’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LAC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SGML’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both LAC and SGML are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LAC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SGML’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LAC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SGML’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LAC is a better buy in the short-term than SGML.

Price Growth

LAC (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +94.77% price change this week, while SGML (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +16.01% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +6.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +50.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +116.62%.

Reported Earning Dates

SGML is expected to report earnings on Nov 14, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+6.26% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LAC($1.54B) has a higher market cap than SGML($784M). LAC YTD gains are higher at: 113.131 vs. SGML (-37.344). SGML has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -16.61M vs. LAC (-53.54M). LAC has more cash in the bank: 509M vs. SGML (31.1M). SGML has less debt than LAC: SGML (172M) vs LAC (207M). SGML has higher revenues than LAC: SGML (127M) vs LAC (0).
LACSGMLLAC / SGML
Capitalization1.54B784M196%
EBITDA-53.54M-16.61M322%
Gain YTD113.131-37.344-303%
P/E RatioN/A120.72-
Revenue0127M-
Total Cash509M31.1M1,637%
Total Debt207M172M120%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LAC vs SGML: Fundamental Ratings
LAC
SGML
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2618
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
40
Fair valued
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10087
SMR RATING
1..100
9597
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3447
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10019
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LAC's Valuation (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SGML (89). This means that LAC’s stock grew somewhat faster than SGML’s over the last 12 months.

SGML's Profit vs Risk Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as LAC (100). This means that SGML’s stock grew similarly to LAC’s over the last 12 months.

LAC's SMR Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as SGML (97). This means that LAC’s stock grew similarly to SGML’s over the last 12 months.

LAC's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as SGML (47). This means that LAC’s stock grew similarly to SGML’s over the last 12 months.

SGML's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LAC (100). This means that SGML’s stock grew significantly faster than LAC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LACSGML
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SGML
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OFSFX22.050.23
+1.05%
Olstein Strategic Opportunities Adviser
EIHSX13.020.09
+0.70%
Eaton Vance Worldwide Health Sci I
PJGCX14.830.09
+0.61%
PGIM Jennison Focused Value C
OGFAX99.710.60
+0.60%
JPMorgan Equity Index R6
SASMX38.140.20
+0.53%
ClearBridge Small Cap Growth A

LAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LAC has been loosely correlated with SLI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LAC jumps, then SLI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LAC
1D Price
Change %
LAC100%
-14.11%
SLI - LAC
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.79%
SGML - LAC
46%
Loosely correlated
-2.36%
RIO - LAC
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.96%
VALE - LAC
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.74%
LAR - LAC
41%
Loosely correlated
-7.81%
More

SGML and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SGML has been loosely correlated with LAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SGML jumps, then LAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SGML
1D Price
Change %
SGML100%
-2.36%
LAC - SGML
46%
Loosely correlated
-14.11%
VALE - SGML
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.74%
LAR - SGML
45%
Loosely correlated
-7.81%
RIO - SGML
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.96%
SLI - SGML
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.79%
More