LAC
Price
$2.75
Change
-$0.03 (-1.08%)
Updated
Jun 30, 11:38 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.14B
SAVNF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 20 closing price
Capitalization
98.69M
Interact to see
Advertisement

LAC vs SAVNF

Header iconLAC vs SAVNF Comparison
Open Charts LAC vs SAVNFBanner chart's image
Lithium Americas
Price$2.75
Change-$0.03 (-1.08%)
Volume$2.7K
Capitalization1.14B
SAVANNAH RESOURCES
Price$0.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$6K
Capitalization98.69M
LAC vs SAVNF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SAVNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LAC vs. SAVNF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAC is a Buy and SAVNF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (LAC: $2.77 vs. SAVNF: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: LAC and SAVNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LAC: 158% vs. SAVNF: 33%
Market capitalization -- LAC: $1.14B vs. SAVNF: $98.69M
LAC [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $1.14B. SAVNF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $98.69M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.07B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LAC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSAVNF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LAC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SAVNF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both LAC and SAVNF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LAC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SAVNF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LAC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SAVNF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LAC is a better buy in the short-term than SAVNF.

Price Growth

LAC (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +9.49% price change this week, while SAVNF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.67%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.96% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LAC($1.14B) has a higher market cap than SAVNF($98.7M). LAC YTD gains are higher at: -6.734 vs. SAVNF (-9.077). LAC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -3.27M vs. SAVNF (-3.48M). LAC has more cash in the bank: 196M vs. SAVNF (13M). SAVNF has less debt than LAC: SAVNF (1.13K) vs LAC (3.11M). LAC (0) and SAVNF (0) have equivalent revenues.
LACSAVNFLAC / SAVNF
Capitalization1.14B98.7M1,159%
EBITDA-3.27M-3.48M94%
Gain YTD-6.734-9.07774%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash196M13M1,508%
Total Debt3.11M1.13K275,000%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LAC: Fundamental Ratings
LAC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
92
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
59
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LACSAVNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SAVNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RGEAX10.720.08
+0.75%
Russell Inv Global Equity A
GURIX32.110.10
+0.31%
NAA Risk Managed Real Estate Inst
NRLCX47.770.15
+0.31%
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Value R6
YOVLX15.420.04
+0.26%
Yorktown Small-Cap L
PJNQX60.17-0.66
-1.08%
PGIM Jennison Natural Resources R6

LAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LAC has been closely correlated with LAR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LAC jumps, then LAR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LAC
1D Price
Change %
LAC100%
N/A
LAR - LAC
71%
Closely correlated
+0.47%
SGML - LAC
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.07%
PLL - LAC
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.35%
SCCO - LAC
52%
Loosely correlated
-2.04%
FCX - LAC
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.33%
More

SAVNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SAVNF and LAC have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SAVNF and LAC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SAVNF
1D Price
Change %
SAVNF100%
N/A
LAC - SAVNF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SFRRF - SAVNF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EMGDF - SAVNF
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.98%
BQSSF - SAVNF
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.43%
IONGF - SAVNF
1%
Poorly correlated
+26.02%
More