LAC
Price
$2.66
Change
-$0.05 (-1.85%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.14B
QQREF
Price
$0.07
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

LAC vs QQREF

Header iconLAC vs QQREF Comparison
Open Charts LAC vs QQREFBanner chart's image
Lithium Americas
Price$2.66
Change-$0.05 (-1.85%)
Volume$2.69M
Capitalization1.14B
Quebec Rare Earth Elements
Price$0.07
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.9K
CapitalizationN/A
LAC vs QQREF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QQREF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LAC vs. QQREF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAC is a Hold and QQREF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (LAC: $2.66 vs. QQREF: $0.07)
Brand notoriety: LAC and QQREF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LAC: 61% vs. QQREF: 71%
Market capitalization -- LAC: $1.14B vs. QQREF: $0
LAC [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $1.14B. QQREF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LAC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileQQREF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LAC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • QQREF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, QQREF is a better buy in the long-term than LAC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LAC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QQREF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LAC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • QQREF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both LAC and QQREF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

LAC (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -3.97% price change this week, while QQREF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +25.66% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.03%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.13% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QQREF YTD gains are higher at: 96.429 vs. LAC (-10.438).
LACQQREFLAC / QQREF
Capitalization1.14BN/A-
EBITDA-3.27MN/A-
Gain YTD-10.43896.429-11%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue0N/A-
Total Cash196MN/A-
Total Debt3.11MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LAC vs QQREF: Fundamental Ratings
LAC
QQREF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9293
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6035
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

QQREF's Valuation (30) in the null industry is in the same range as LAC (32). This means that QQREF’s stock grew similarly to LAC’s over the last 12 months.

QQREF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as LAC (100). This means that QQREF’s stock grew similarly to LAC’s over the last 12 months.

LAC's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as QQREF (93). This means that LAC’s stock grew similarly to QQREF’s over the last 12 months.

QQREF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as LAC (60). This means that QQREF’s stock grew similarly to LAC’s over the last 12 months.

QQREF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as LAC (100). This means that QQREF’s stock grew similarly to LAC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LACQQREF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QQREF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ALTI4.140.01
+0.24%
AlTi Global
HRMY32.160.05
+0.16%
Harmony Biosciences Holdings
BODI4.22-0.04
-0.94%
Beachbody Company (The)
CHRW98.03-1.11
-1.12%
C.H. Robinson Worldwide
ESGRO19.25-0.30
-1.53%
Enstar Group Limited

LAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LAC has been closely correlated with LAR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LAC jumps, then LAR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LAC
1D Price
Change %
LAC100%
-1.85%
LAR - LAC
71%
Closely correlated
-0.85%
SGML - LAC
58%
Loosely correlated
+7.90%
PLL - LAC
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.51%
SCCO - LAC
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.22%
FCX - LAC
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.07%
More

QQREF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that QQREF and HDRSF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QQREF and HDRSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QQREF
1D Price
Change %
QQREF100%
N/A
HDRSF - QQREF
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.58%
THURF - QQREF
26%
Poorly correlated
+29.60%
LILIF - QQREF
5%
Poorly correlated
+9.50%
RNGE - QQREF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LAC - QQREF
0%
Poorly correlated
-1.85%
More