LAC
Price
$3.10
Change
-$0.10 (-3.12%)
Updated
Jan 22, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.14B
PMYLF
Price
$0.15
Change
+$0.07 (+87.50%)
Updated
Oct 28 closing price
Capitalization
23.24M
Ad is loading...

LAC vs PMYLF

Header iconLAC vs PMYLF Comparison
Open Charts LAC vs PMYLFBanner chart's image
Lithium Americas
Price$3.10
Change-$0.10 (-3.12%)
Volume$99.95K
Capitalization1.14B
Boab Metals
Price$0.15
Change+$0.07 (+87.50%)
Volume$30K
Capitalization23.24M
LAC vs PMYLF Comparison Chart
Loading...
LAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LAC vs. PMYLF commentary
Jan 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAC is a Hold and PMYLF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 23, 2025
Stock price -- (LAC: $3.20 vs. PMYLF: $0.15)
Brand notoriety: LAC and PMYLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LAC: 177% vs. PMYLF: 100%
Market capitalization -- LAC: $1.14B vs. PMYLF: $23.24M
LAC [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $1.14B. PMYLF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $23.24M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LAC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePMYLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LAC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PMYLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LAC is a better buy in the long-term than PMYLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LAC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • LAC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

LAC (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -2.44% price change this week, while PMYLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.15%.

Reported Earning Dates

LAC is expected to report earnings on Oct 26, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.44% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LAC($1.14B) has a higher market cap than PMYLF($23.2M). LAC YTD gains are higher at: 7.744 vs. PMYLF (0.000). LAC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -3.27M vs. PMYLF (-4.92M). LAC has more cash in the bank: 196M vs. PMYLF (2.91M). PMYLF has less debt than LAC: PMYLF (99.6K) vs LAC (3.11M). PMYLF has higher revenues than LAC: PMYLF (132K) vs LAC (0).
LACPMYLFLAC / PMYLF
Capitalization1.14B23.2M4,931%
EBITDA-3.27M-4.92M66%
Gain YTD7.7440.000-
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue0132K-
Total Cash196M2.91M6,738%
Total Debt3.11M99.6K3,126%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LAC: Fundamental Ratings
LAC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
15
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
91
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
43
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LAC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X106146.2660004129.601600
+4.05%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY603.055.47
+0.92%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
GME27.47-0.04
-0.15%
GameStop Corp
TSLA424.07-2.43
-0.57%
Tesla
AAPL222.64-7.34
-3.19%
Apple

LAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LAC has been loosely correlated with PLL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LAC jumps, then PLL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LAC
1D Price
Change %
LAC100%
-8.31%
PLL - LAC
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.17%
SGML - LAC
51%
Loosely correlated
-3.91%
MP - LAC
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.33%
IE - LAC
39%
Loosely correlated
-1.94%
SLI - LAC
38%
Loosely correlated
-3.57%
More

PMYLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PMYLF has been loosely correlated with WTRNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PMYLF jumps, then WTRNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PMYLF
1D Price
Change %
PMYLF100%
N/A
WTRNF - PMYLF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
LAC - PMYLF
29%
Poorly correlated
-8.31%
SRCGF - PMYLF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HPQFF - PMYLF
24%
Poorly correlated
-3.12%
OBRUF - PMYLF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More