LAC
Price
$2.90
Change
+$0.03 (+1.05%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
702.82M
PLL
Price
$9.55
Change
-$0.13 (-1.34%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
209.58M
75 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LAC vs PLL

Header iconLAC vs PLL Comparison
Open Charts LAC vs PLLBanner chart's image
Lithium Americas
Price$2.90
Change+$0.03 (+1.05%)
Volume$6.19M
Capitalization702.82M
Piedmont Lithium
Price$9.55
Change-$0.13 (-1.34%)
Volume$214.15K
Capitalization209.58M
LAC vs PLL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PLL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LAC vs. PLL commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAC is a Hold and PLL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (LAC: $2.90 vs. PLL: $9.55)
Brand notoriety: LAC and PLL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LAC: 75% vs. PLL: 43%
Market capitalization -- LAC: $702.82M vs. PLL: $209.58M
LAC [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $702.82M. PLL’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $209.58M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LAC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePLL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LAC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PLL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PLL is a better buy in the long-term than LAC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LAC’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PLL’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LAC’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • PLL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LAC is a better buy in the short-term than PLL.

Price Growth

LAC (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +3.94% price change this week, while PLL (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +6.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +1.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +40.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

PLL is expected to report earnings on Oct 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+1.88% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LAC($703M) has a higher market cap than PLL($210M). PLL YTD gains are higher at: 9.268 vs. LAC (-2.357). LAC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -46.84M vs. PLL (-55.21M). LAC has more cash in the bank: 447M vs. PLL (68.9M). LAC has less debt than PLL: LAC (21.2M) vs PLL (30.6M). PLL has higher revenues than LAC: PLL (106M) vs LAC (0).
LACPLLLAC / PLL
Capitalization703M210M335%
EBITDA-46.84M-55.21M85%
Gain YTD-2.3579.268-25%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue0106M-
Total Cash447M68.9M649%
Total Debt21.2M30.6M69%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LAC vs PLL: Fundamental Ratings
LAC
PLL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6221
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
34
Fair valued
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10096
SMR RATING
1..100
9495
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5338
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PLL's Valuation (32) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is in the same range as LAC (34) in the null industry. This means that PLL’s stock grew similarly to LAC’s over the last 12 months.

PLL's Profit vs Risk Rating (96) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is in the same range as LAC (100) in the null industry. This means that PLL’s stock grew similarly to LAC’s over the last 12 months.

LAC's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as PLL (95) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that LAC’s stock grew similarly to PLL’s over the last 12 months.

PLL's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is in the same range as LAC (53) in the null industry. This means that PLL’s stock grew similarly to LAC’s over the last 12 months.

PLL's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is in the same range as LAC (100) in the null industry. This means that PLL’s stock grew similarly to LAC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LACPLL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PLL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BAYRY7.900.18
+2.33%
Bayer A.G.
KRKNF2.760.03
+0.92%
Kraken Robotics Inc.
MNNGF0.08N/A
N/A
Affluent Partners Holdings Ltd.
BKGFF49.58N/A
N/A
Berkeley Group Holdings Plc.
AVCRF0.05-0.02
-27.51%
Avricore Health Inc.

PLL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PLL has been loosely correlated with LAR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PLL jumps, then LAR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PLL
1D Price
Change %
PLL100%
-1.34%
LAR - PLL
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.48%
SGML - PLL
47%
Loosely correlated
+13.27%
BHP - PLL
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.61%
IONR - PLL
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.83%
TECK - PLL
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.09%
More