LAC
Price
$2.66
Change
-$0.05 (-1.85%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.14B
NMG
Price
$1.66
Change
+$0.01 (+0.61%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
206.56M
32 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LAC vs NMG

Header iconLAC vs NMG Comparison
Open Charts LAC vs NMGBanner chart's image
Lithium Americas
Price$2.66
Change-$0.05 (-1.85%)
Volume$2.69M
Capitalization1.14B
Nouveau Monde Graphite
Price$1.66
Change+$0.01 (+0.61%)
Volume$16.76K
Capitalization206.56M
LAC vs NMG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NMG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LAC vs. NMG commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAC is a Hold and NMG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (LAC: $2.66 vs. NMG: $1.66)
Brand notoriety: LAC and NMG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LAC: 61% vs. NMG: 42%
Market capitalization -- LAC: $1.14B vs. NMG: $206.56M
LAC [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $1.14B. NMG’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $206.56M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LAC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNMG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LAC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NMG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both LAC and NMG are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LAC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NMG’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LAC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • NMG’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LAC is a better buy in the short-term than NMG.

Price Growth

LAC (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -3.97% price change this week, while NMG (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -0.60% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.03%.

Reported Earning Dates

NMG is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.13% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LAC($1.14B) has a higher market cap than NMG($207M). NMG YTD gains are higher at: 4.403 vs. LAC (-10.438). LAC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -3.27M vs. NMG (-27.14M). LAC has more cash in the bank: 196M vs. NMG (48.6M). LAC has less debt than NMG: LAC (3.11M) vs NMG (57.5M). LAC (0) and NMG (0) have equivalent revenues.
LACNMGLAC / NMG
Capitalization1.14B207M553%
EBITDA-3.27M-27.14M12%
Gain YTD-10.4384.403-237%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash196M48.6M403%
Total Debt3.11M57.5M5%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LAC vs NMG: Fundamental Ratings
LAC
NMG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
42
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10098
SMR RATING
1..100
9297
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6058
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LAC's Valuation (32) in the null industry is in the same range as NMG (42). This means that LAC’s stock grew similarly to NMG’s over the last 12 months.

NMG's Profit vs Risk Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as LAC (100). This means that NMG’s stock grew similarly to LAC’s over the last 12 months.

LAC's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as NMG (97). This means that LAC’s stock grew similarly to NMG’s over the last 12 months.

NMG's Price Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as LAC (60). This means that NMG’s stock grew similarly to LAC’s over the last 12 months.

NMG's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as LAC (100). This means that NMG’s stock grew similarly to LAC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LACNMG
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NMG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ILGCX22.390.27
+1.22%
Columbia Integrated Large Cap Gr A
OALVX19.890.14
+0.71%
Optimum Large Cap Value A
MLVKX32.350.21
+0.65%
BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Val K
OTCFX57.290.35
+0.61%
T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Stock
SHDPX9.760.05
+0.51%
American Beacon Shapiro SMID Cap Eq Inv

LAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LAC has been closely correlated with LAR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LAC jumps, then LAR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LAC
1D Price
Change %
LAC100%
-1.85%
LAR - LAC
71%
Closely correlated
-0.85%
SGML - LAC
58%
Loosely correlated
+7.90%
PLL - LAC
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.51%
SCCO - LAC
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.22%
FCX - LAC
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.07%
More

NMG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NMG and ERO have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NMG and ERO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NMG
1D Price
Change %
NMG100%
+0.61%
ERO - NMG
31%
Poorly correlated
-2.81%
LAR - NMG
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.85%
SCCO - NMG
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.22%
LAC - NMG
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.85%
SRCAF - NMG
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More