LAC
Price
$2.89
Change
+$0.10 (+3.58%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
701.39M
MP
Price
$63.05
Change
-$1.13 (-1.76%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
11.17B
53 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LAC vs MP

Header iconLAC vs MP Comparison
Open Charts LAC vs MPBanner chart's image
Lithium Americas
Price$2.89
Change+$0.10 (+3.58%)
Volume$5.93M
Capitalization701.39M
MP Materials
Price$63.05
Change-$1.13 (-1.76%)
Volume$6.9M
Capitalization11.17B
LAC vs MP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LAC vs. MP commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAC is a StrongBuy and MP is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (LAC: $2.89 vs. MP: $63.05)
Brand notoriety: LAC and MP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LAC: 69% vs. MP: 41%
Market capitalization -- LAC: $701.39M vs. MP: $11.17B
LAC [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $701.39M. MP’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $11.17B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LAC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LAC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MP is a better buy in the long-term than LAC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LAC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MP’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LAC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MP’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LAC is a better buy in the short-term than MP.

Price Growth

LAC (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -3.34% price change this week, while MP (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -11.37% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +55.53%.

Reported Earning Dates

MP is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.20% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MP($11.2B) has a higher market cap than LAC($701M). MP YTD gains are higher at: 304.167 vs. LAC (-2.694). MP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -28.67M vs. LAC (-53.54M). MP has more cash in the bank: 754M vs. LAC (509M). LAC has less debt than MP: LAC (207M) vs MP (917M). MP has higher revenues than LAC: MP (242M) vs LAC (0).
LACMPLAC / MP
Capitalization701M11.2B6%
EBITDA-53.54M-28.67M187%
Gain YTD-2.694304.167-1%
P/E RatioN/A770.50-
Revenue0242M-
Total Cash509M754M68%
Total Debt207M917M23%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LAC: Fundamental Ratings
LAC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
31
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
95
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
49
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LACMP
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BBLB83.731.29
+1.56%
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. TrsBd20+YrETF
BTT22.550.18
+0.80%
BlackRock Municipal 2030 Target Term Trust
PGZ10.500.06
+0.57%
PRINCIPAL REAL ESTATE Income FUND
XBB41.150.08
+0.19%
BondBloxx BB Rated USD HY Corp Bd ETF
STXI29.40N/A
N/A
Strive International Developed Mkts ETF

LAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LAC has been loosely correlated with SGML. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LAC jumps, then SGML could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LAC
1D Price
Change %
LAC100%
+3.58%
SGML - LAC
52%
Loosely correlated
+6.46%
SLI - LAC
49%
Loosely correlated
+6.97%
TECK - LAC
47%
Loosely correlated
+4.70%
VALE - LAC
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.36%
RIO - LAC
45%
Loosely correlated
+2.42%
More

MP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MP has been loosely correlated with TMC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MP jumps, then TMC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MP
1D Price
Change %
MP100%
-1.76%
TMC - MP
40%
Loosely correlated
N/A
USAR - MP
39%
Loosely correlated
-1.77%
NB - MP
38%
Loosely correlated
-6.15%
LAC - MP
36%
Loosely correlated
+3.58%
PLL - MP
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More