LAC
Price
$2.97
Change
+$0.03 (+1.02%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
MP
Price
$15.84
Change
-$0.34 (-2.10%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
60 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

LAC vs MP

Header iconLAC vs MP Comparison
Open Charts LAC vs MPBanner chart's image
Lithium Americas
Price$2.97
Change+$0.03 (+1.02%)
Volume$4.49M
CapitalizationN/A
MP Materials
Price$15.84
Change-$0.34 (-2.10%)
Volume$4.51M
CapitalizationN/A
LAC vs MP Comparison Chart
Loading...
LAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LAC vs. MP commentary
Dec 23, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAC is a Hold and MP is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 23, 2024
Stock price -- (LAC: $2.97 vs. MP: $15.84)
Brand notoriety: LAC and MP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LAC: 43% vs. MP: 160%
Market capitalization -- LAC: $1.14B vs. MP: $2.37B
LAC [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $1.14B. MP’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $2.37B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LAC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LAC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both LAC and MP are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LAC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MP’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LAC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MP’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both LAC and MP are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

LAC (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -8.62% price change this week, while MP (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -18.22% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -1.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.17%.

Reported Earning Dates

LAC is expected to report earnings on Oct 26, 2023.

MP is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (-1.75% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MP($2.37B) has a higher market cap than LAC($1.14B). MP YTD gains are higher at: -20.202 vs. LAC (-53.594). MP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 94M vs. LAC (-3.27M). MP has more cash in the bank: 998M vs. LAC (196M). LAC has less debt than MP: LAC (3.11M) vs MP (689M). MP has higher revenues than LAC: MP (253M) vs LAC (0).
LACMPLAC / MP
Capitalization1.14B2.37B48%
EBITDA-3.27M94M-3%
Gain YTD-53.594-20.202265%
P/E RatioN/A107.71-
Revenue0253M-
Total Cash196M998M20%
Total Debt3.11M689M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LAC: Fundamental Ratings
LAC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
58
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
90
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
61
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LACMP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME29.820.82
+2.83%
GameStop Corp
AAPL254.494.70
+1.88%
Apple
SPY591.157.02
+1.20%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X97224.730000-531.203100
-0.54%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA421.06-15.11
-3.46%
Tesla

LAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LAC has been loosely correlated with PLL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LAC jumps, then PLL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LAC
1D Price
Change %
LAC100%
+1.02%
PLL - LAC
54%
Loosely correlated
-2.40%
MP - LAC
48%
Loosely correlated
-2.10%
SGML - LAC
48%
Loosely correlated
+1.01%
IE - LAC
40%
Loosely correlated
+4.48%
SLI - LAC
38%
Loosely correlated
+5.04%
More

MP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MP has been loosely correlated with LAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MP jumps, then LAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MP
1D Price
Change %
MP100%
-2.10%
LAC - MP
48%
Loosely correlated
+1.02%
HBM - MP
48%
Loosely correlated
+4.17%
IE - MP
46%
Loosely correlated
+4.48%
PLL - MP
45%
Loosely correlated
-2.40%
TECK - MP
43%
Loosely correlated
+2.38%
More