Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LABU vs QLD
LABU vs QLD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LABU vs. QLD commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LABU is a Hold and QLD is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QLD has more net assets: 8.89B vs. LABU (678M). QLD has a higher annual dividend yield than LABU: QLD (10.544) vs LABU (-31.262). LABU was incepted earlier than QLD: LABU (10 years) vs QLD (19 years). LABU (0.93) and QLD (0.95) have comparable expense ratios . LABU has a higher turnover QLD (24.00) vs QLD (24.00).
| LABU | QLD | LABU / QLD | |
| Gain YTD | -31.262 | 10.544 | -296% |
| Net Assets | 678M | 8.89B | 8% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.95 | 98% |
| Turnover | 179.00 | 24.00 | 746% |
| Yield | 0.57 | 0.22 | 257% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LABU | QLD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 90% | 18 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
LABU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LABU has been closely correlated with DNLI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LABU jumps, then DNLI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LABU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LABU | 100% | +1.38% | ||
| DNLI - LABU | 72% Closely correlated | -1.41% | ||
| BEAM - LABU | 72% Closely correlated | +0.65% | ||
| KRYS - LABU | 72% Closely correlated | +1.22% | ||
| IDYA - LABU | 71% Closely correlated | +0.82% | ||
| CRNX - LABU | 71% Closely correlated | +1.22% | ||
More | ||||
QLD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QLD has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QLD jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QLD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QLD | 100% | +1.88% | ||
| LRCX - QLD | 81% Closely correlated | -0.02% | ||
| META - QLD | 78% Closely correlated | +0.76% | ||
| ARM - QLD | 77% Closely correlated | +0.30% | ||
| CDNS - QLD | 76% Closely correlated | +5.10% | ||
| NXPI - QLD | 75% Closely correlated | +0.41% | ||
More | ||||