LAAOF
Price
Loading...
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Loading...
Capitalization
21.22B
MULN
Price
$0.43
Change
-$0.17 (-28.33%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
34.07M
Interact to see
Advertisement

LAAOF vs MULN

Header iconLAAOF vs MULN Comparison
Open Charts LAAOF vs MULNBanner chart's image
Li Auto
PriceLoading...
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Capitalization21.22B
Mullen Automotive
Price$0.43
Change-$0.17 (-28.33%)
Volume$14.97M
Capitalization34.07M
LAAOF vs MULN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LAAOF vs. MULN commentary
Jul 01, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAAOF is a Hold and MULN is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 01, 2025
Stock price -- (LAAOF: $9.49 vs. MULN: $0.60)
Brand notoriety: LAAOF and MULN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Motor Vehicles industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LAAOF: 100% vs. MULN: 263%
Market capitalization -- LAAOF: $21.22B vs. MULN: $34.07M
LAAOF [@Motor Vehicles] is valued at $21.22B. MULN’s [@Motor Vehicles] market capitalization is $34.07M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Motor Vehicles] industry ranges from $559.85B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Motor Vehicles] industry is $35.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LAAOF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMULN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LAAOF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MULN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both LAAOF and MULN are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MULN’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MULN’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

LAAOF (@Motor Vehicles) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MULN (@Motor Vehicles) price change was -55.26% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Motor Vehicles industry was +1.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.78%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Motor Vehicles (+1.49% weekly)

Automobiles continue to be arguably the most popular form of passenger travel in the U.S., and major automobile makers have revenues and market capitalizations running into multi-billions. In recent years, the industry has been experiencing some path-breaking innovations like electric vehicles and self-driving technology. While there are long-standing companies like General Motors, Ford, and Toyota Motors operating in this space, there are also emerging/rapidly growing players like Tesla – which has had a major role in the growing popularity of the electric vehicle market. With technological advancements taking steam in the auto space, we’ve also witnessed collaborations (or talks of potential partnerships) of carmakers with tech behemoths like Google’s subsidiary, Waymo.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LAAOF($21.2B) has a higher market cap than MULN($34.1M). LAAOF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. MULN (-100.000). MULN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -686.05M vs. LAAOF (-974.33M). LAAOF has more cash in the bank: 52B vs. MULN (81.5M). MULN has less debt than LAAOF: MULN (19M) vs LAAOF (11.9B). LAAOF has higher revenues than MULN: LAAOF (38.3B) vs MULN (366K).
LAAOFMULNLAAOF / MULN
Capitalization21.2B34.1M62,170%
EBITDA-974.33M-686.05M142%
Gain YTD0.000-100.000-
P/E RatioN/A0.00-
Revenue38.3B366K10,464,481%
Total Cash52B81.5M63,804%
Total Debt11.9B19M62,632%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MULN: Fundamental Ratings
MULN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
57
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
99
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LAAOFMULN
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
9%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
8%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MULN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LASE2.690.29
+12.08%
Laser Photonics Corp
ALAR13.530.68
+5.29%
Alarum Technologies Ltd
AGX220.480.74
+0.34%
Argan
WLK75.93-0.21
-0.28%
Westlake Corp
EVER24.18-0.07
-0.29%
EverQuote

LAAOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LAAOF and GGR have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LAAOF and GGR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LAAOF
1D Price
Change %
LAAOF100%
N/A
GGR - LAAOF
4%
Poorly correlated
+8.41%
VLVOF - LAAOF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PEVM - LAAOF
2%
Poorly correlated
-6.20%
LCID - LAAOF
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.47%
MULN - LAAOF
1%
Poorly correlated
-27.45%
More

MULN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MULN and TSLA have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MULN and TSLA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MULN
1D Price
Change %
MULN100%
-27.45%
TSLA - MULN
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.84%
SVUHF - MULN
21%
Poorly correlated
+9.09%
CENN - MULN
20%
Poorly correlated
+8.99%
WKHS - MULN
16%
Poorly correlated
-3.51%
NWTN - MULN
16%
Poorly correlated
+5.96%
More