Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAAFX vs RMFEX
LAAFX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LAAFX vs RMFEX
Lord Abbett Affiliated F
Price$19.24
Change-$0.19 (-0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.01B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$57.86
Change-$0.45 (-0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.76B
LAAFX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAAFX vs. RMFEX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAAFX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 106B vs. LAAFX (6.01B). LAAFX pays higher dividends than RMFEX: LAAFX (1.72) vs RMFEX (1.58). LAAFX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LAAFX (18 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). RMFEX (0.62) is less costly to investors than LAAFX (0.54). LAAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). LAAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: LAAFX (0) vs RMFEX (250). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.03 vs. LAAFX (7.48). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 62.32 vs. LAAFX (56.75).
| LAAFX | RMFEX | LAAFX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.62 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.62 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.586 | 6.152 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.01B | 106B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.72 | 1.58 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.48 | 9.03 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.43 | 29.63 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.75 | 62.32 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.33 | 76.27 | 45% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement