Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAAFX vs RMFEX
LAAFX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LAAFX vs RMFEX
Lord Abbett Affiliated F
Price$20.33
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.45B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$59.74
Change+$0.01 (+0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.8B
LAAFX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAAFX vs. RMFEX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAAFX is a Hold and RMFEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. LAAFX (6.45B). LAAFX pays higher dividends than RMFEX: LAAFX (1.51) vs RMFEX (1.43). LAAFX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LAAFX (18 years) vs RMFEX (24 years). RMFEX (0.62) is less costly to investors than LAAFX (0.54). LAAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). LAAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: LAAFX (0) vs RMFEX (250). LAAFX (8.51) and RMFEX (8.33) have marching annual gain over last year. RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 48.36 vs. LAAFX (43.45).
| LAAFX | RMFEX | LAAFX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.62 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.62 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.100 | 9.965 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.45B | 112B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.51 | 1.43 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.51 | 8.33 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.59 | 30.01 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.45 | 48.36 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.68 | 99.29 | 63% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers