Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAAFX vs RMFEX
LAAFX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LAAFX vs RMFEX
Lord Abbett Affiliated F
Price$19.94
Change+$0.13 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.22B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$59.82
Change+$0.38 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.01B
LAAFX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAAFX vs. RMFEX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAAFX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. LAAFX (6.22B). LAAFX (1.60) and RMFEX (1.53) have matching dividends . LAAFX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LAAFX (18 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). RMFEX (0.62) is less costly to investors than LAAFX (0.54). LAAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). LAAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: LAAFX (0) vs RMFEX (250). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.81 vs. LAAFX (10.55). RMFEX (64.33) and LAAFX (62.87) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAAFX | RMFEX | LAAFX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.62 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.62 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.712 | 9.748 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.22B | 109B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.60 | 1.53 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.55 | 11.81 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.12 | 30.45 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.87 | 64.33 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.74 | 86.20 | 50% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement