Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAAFX vs RMFEX
LAAFX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LAAFX vs RMFEX
Lord Abbett Affiliated F
Price$20.83
Change-$0.29 (-1.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.42B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$61.97
Change-$0.71 (-1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.28B
LAAFX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAAFX vs. RMFEX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAAFX is a StrongBuy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. LAAFX (6.42B). LAAFX (1.49) and RMFEX (1.46) have matching dividends . LAAFX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LAAFX (18 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). RMFEX (0.62) is less costly to investors than LAAFX (0.54). LAAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). LAAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: LAAFX (0) vs RMFEX (250). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.02 vs. LAAFX (3.52). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 57.30 vs. LAAFX (50.54).
| LAAFX | RMFEX | LAAFX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.62 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.62 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.863 | 15.396 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.42B | 112B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.49 | 1.46 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.52 | 7.02 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.39 | 31.78 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.54 | 57.30 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.09 | 101.84 | 54% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers