Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAAFX vs RMFCX
LAAFX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAAFX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Affiliated F
Price$20.44
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.27B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.38
Change-$0.07 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.46B
LAAFX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAAFX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAAFX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. LAAFX (6.27B). LAAFX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: LAAFX (1.55) vs RMFCX (1.24). LAAFX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAAFX (18 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than LAAFX (0.54). LAAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LAAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAAFX (0) vs RMFCX (250). LAAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.35 vs. RMFCX (7.71). RMFCX (56.41) and LAAFX (55.70) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAAFX | RMFCX | LAAFX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.91 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.91 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.088 | 11.421 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.27B | 109B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.55 | 1.24 | 126% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.35 | 7.71 | 121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.41 | 32.16 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.70 | 56.41 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.20 | 91.12 | 61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers