Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAAFX vs RMFCX
LAAFX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAAFX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Affiliated F
Price$20.33
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.45B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.36
Change+$0.01 (+0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.8B
LAAFX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAAFX vs. RMFCX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAAFX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. LAAFX (6.45B). LAAFX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: LAAFX (1.51) vs RMFCX (1.18). LAAFX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAAFX (18 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than LAAFX (0.54). LAAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LAAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAAFX (0) vs RMFCX (250). LAAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.51 vs. RMFCX (8.05). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 46.17 vs. LAAFX (43.45).
| LAAFX | RMFCX | LAAFX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.91 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.91 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.100 | 9.696 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.45B | 112B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.51 | 1.18 | 128% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.51 | 8.05 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.59 | 28.89 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.45 | 46.17 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.68 | 91.60 | 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers