Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAAFX vs RMEBX
LAAFX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LAAFX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Affiliated F
Price$20.10
Change+$0.10 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.24B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.75
Change+$0.28 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.54B
LAAFX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAAFX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAAFX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. LAAFX (6.24B). LAAFX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: LAAFX (1.60) vs RMEBX (1.12). LAAFX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LAAFX (18 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LAAFX (0.54). LAAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). LAAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LAAFX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.26 vs. LAAFX (10.00). RMEBX (59.35) and LAAFX (59.16) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAAFX | RMEBX | LAAFX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 1.07 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 1.07 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.576 | 11.253 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.24B | 111B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.60 | 1.12 | 143% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.00 | 11.26 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.16 | 30.31 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.16 | 59.35 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.79 | 80.17 | 55% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers