Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAAFX vs RMEBX
LAAFX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LAAFX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Affiliated F
Price$20.92
Change+$0.19 (+0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.34B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$62.36
Change+$0.51 (+0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.18B
LAAFX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAAFX vs. RMEBX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAAFX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. LAAFX (6.34B). LAAFX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: LAAFX (1.48) vs RMEBX (1.05). LAAFX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LAAFX (18 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LAAFX (0.54). LAAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). LAAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LAAFX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX (4.81) and LAAFX (4.66) have marching annual gain over last year. LAAFX (56.28) and RMEBX (55.95) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAAFX | RMEBX | LAAFX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 1.07 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 1.07 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.321 | 13.527 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.34B | 111B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.48 | 1.05 | 141% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.66 | 4.81 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.70 | 38.19 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.28 | 55.95 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.45 | 89.36 | 60% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers