Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAAFX vs RMEBX
LAAFX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LAAFX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Affiliated F
Price$19.94
Change+$0.13 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.22B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$59.79
Change+$0.38 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.01B
LAAFX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAAFX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAAFX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. LAAFX (6.22B). LAAFX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: LAAFX (1.60) vs RMEBX (1.12). LAAFX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LAAFX (18 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LAAFX (0.54). LAAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). LAAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LAAFX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.31 vs. LAAFX (10.55). LAAFX (62.87) and RMEBX (60.65) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAAFX | RMEBX | LAAFX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 1.07 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 1.07 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.712 | 9.495 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.22B | 109B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.60 | 1.12 | 143% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.55 | 11.31 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.12 | 28.70 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.87 | 60.65 | 104% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.74 | 77.57 | 55% |