L
Price
$96.64
Change
-$0.89 (-0.91%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
20.05B
57 days until earnings call
WTM
Price
$1796.03
Change
-$4.48 (-0.25%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
4.63B
64 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

L vs WTM

Header iconL vs WTM Comparison
Open Charts L vs WTMBanner chart's image
Loews
Price$96.64
Change-$0.89 (-0.91%)
Volume$770.46K
Capitalization20.05B
White Mountains Insurance Group
Price$1796.03
Change-$4.48 (-0.25%)
Volume$20.91K
Capitalization4.63B
L vs WTM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WTM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
L vs. WTM commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is L is a Buy and WTM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (L: $96.64 vs. WTM: $1796.03)
Brand notoriety: L and WTM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: L: 100% vs. WTM: 78%
Market capitalization -- L: $20.05B vs. WTM: $4.63B
L [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $20.05B. WTM’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $4.63B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $143B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $17.87B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

L’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWTM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • L’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WTM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, L is a better buy in the long-term than WTM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

L’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WTM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • L’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WTM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, L is a better buy in the short-term than WTM.

Price Growth

L (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а -0.17% price change this week, while WTM (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -1.87% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +0.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.05%.

Reported Earning Dates

L is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2025.

WTM is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (+0.22% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
L($20B) has a higher market cap than WTM($4.63B). WTM has higher P/E ratio than L: WTM (22.49) vs L (15.34). L YTD gains are higher at: 14.349 vs. WTM (-7.613). WTM has less debt than L: WTM (590M) vs L (8.95B).
LWTML / WTM
Capitalization20B4.63B432%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD14.349-7.613-188%
P/E Ratio15.3422.4968%
RevenueN/A2.58B-
Total CashN/A1.46B-
Total Debt8.95B590M1,516%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
L vs WTM: Fundamental Ratings
L
WTM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1511
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
69
Overvalued
76
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
713
SMR RATING
1..100
9793
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3159
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
247
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
33n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

L's Valuation (69) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as WTM (76). This means that L’s stock grew similarly to WTM’s over the last 12 months.

L's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as WTM (13). This means that L’s stock grew similarly to WTM’s over the last 12 months.

WTM's SMR Rating (93) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as L (97). This means that WTM’s stock grew similarly to L’s over the last 12 months.

L's Price Growth Rating (31) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as WTM (59). This means that L’s stock grew similarly to WTM’s over the last 12 months.

WTM's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as L (24). This means that WTM’s stock grew similarly to L’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LWTM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
52%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
43%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WTM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DPREX13.180.08
+0.61%
Macquarie Global Listed Real Assets A
AVFIX25.710.03
+0.12%
American Beacon Small Cp Val R5
GLRBX24.040.01
+0.04%
James Balanced: Golden Rainbow R
AMRFX61.05N/A
N/A
American Funds American Mutual F2
RTXSX13.15N/A
N/A
Russell Inv Tax-Managed Real Assets S

L and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, L has been closely correlated with CNA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if L jumps, then CNA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To L
1D Price
Change %
L100%
-0.91%
CNA - L
86%
Closely correlated
-1.92%
HIG - L
85%
Closely correlated
-2.25%
CINF - L
84%
Closely correlated
-1.43%
ORI - L
82%
Closely correlated
-0.86%
THG - L
78%
Closely correlated
-2.05%
More

WTM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WTM has been loosely correlated with L. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WTM jumps, then L could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WTM
1D Price
Change %
WTM100%
-0.25%
L - WTM
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.91%
HIG - WTM
60%
Loosely correlated
-2.25%
CINF - WTM
60%
Loosely correlated
-1.43%
MKL - WTM
56%
Loosely correlated
-2.35%
TRV - WTM
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.51%
More