L
Price
$95.00
Change
-$0.58 (-0.61%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
19.71B
78 days until earnings call
WTM
Price
$1769.60
Change
-$74.74 (-4.05%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
4.56B
85 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

L vs WTM

Header iconL vs WTM Comparison
Open Charts L vs WTMBanner chart's image
Loews
Price$95.00
Change-$0.58 (-0.61%)
Volume$947.34K
Capitalization19.71B
White Mountains Insurance Group
Price$1769.60
Change-$74.74 (-4.05%)
Volume$41.91K
Capitalization4.56B
L vs WTM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WTM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
L vs. WTM commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is L is a Hold and WTM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (L: $95.00 vs. WTM: $1769.60)
Brand notoriety: L and WTM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: L: 113% vs. WTM: 165%
Market capitalization -- L: $19.71B vs. WTM: $4.56B
L [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $19.71B. WTM’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $4.56B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $144.88B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $17.86B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

L’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileWTM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • L’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • WTM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, L is a better buy in the long-term than WTM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

L’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WTM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • L’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WTM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, L is a better buy in the short-term than WTM.

Price Growth

L (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а +1.31% price change this week, while WTM (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was +1.03% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +1.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.50%.

Reported Earning Dates

L is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2025.

WTM is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (+1.66% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
L($19.7B) has a higher market cap than WTM($4.56B). WTM has higher P/E ratio than L: WTM (22.16) vs L (15.08). L YTD gains are higher at: 12.335 vs. WTM (-8.972). L has more cash in the bank: 6.74B vs. WTM (1.32B). WTM has less debt than L: WTM (676M) vs L (8.95B). L has higher revenues than WTM: L (17.5B) vs WTM (2.29B).
LWTML / WTM
Capitalization19.7B4.56B432%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD12.335-8.972-137%
P/E Ratio15.0822.1668%
Revenue17.5B2.29B766%
Total Cash6.74B1.32B512%
Total Debt8.95B676M1,323%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
L vs WTM: Fundamental Ratings
L
WTM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1910
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
75
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
711
SMR RATING
1..100
9793
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
2454
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
246
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

L's Valuation (71) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as WTM (75). This means that L’s stock grew similarly to WTM’s over the last 12 months.

L's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as WTM (11). This means that L’s stock grew similarly to WTM’s over the last 12 months.

WTM's SMR Rating (93) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as L (97). This means that WTM’s stock grew similarly to L’s over the last 12 months.

L's Price Growth Rating (24) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as WTM (54). This means that L’s stock grew similarly to WTM’s over the last 12 months.

WTM's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as L (24). This means that WTM’s stock grew similarly to L’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LWTM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
30%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
52%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
28%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WTM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GDL8.370.04
+0.48%
GDL Fund (The)
DISV34.470.16
+0.45%
Dimensional International Sm Cp Val ETF
CGUI25.310.01
+0.03%
Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF
NOVZ43.22-0.12
-0.28%
TrueShares Structured Outcome Nov ETF
CSM73.57-0.21
-0.29%
ProShares Large Cap Core Plus

L and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, L has been closely correlated with CNA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if L jumps, then CNA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To L
1D Price
Change %
L100%
-0.61%
CNA - L
87%
Closely correlated
+0.04%
HIG - L
85%
Closely correlated
-0.59%
CINF - L
84%
Closely correlated
-2.00%
ORI - L
83%
Closely correlated
-0.21%
THG - L
78%
Closely correlated
-1.16%
More

WTM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WTM has been loosely correlated with L. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WTM jumps, then L could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WTM
1D Price
Change %
WTM100%
-4.05%
L - WTM
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.61%
CINF - WTM
60%
Loosely correlated
-2.00%
HIG - WTM
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.59%
CNA - WTM
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.04%
THG - WTM
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.16%
More