L
Price
$105.75
Change
-$0.56 (-0.53%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
21.85B
67 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WTM
Price
$2025.55
Change
-$1.86 (-0.09%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
5.15B
69 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

L vs WTM

Header iconL vs WTM Comparison
Open Charts L vs WTMBanner chart's image
Loews
Price$105.75
Change-$0.56 (-0.53%)
Volume$755.12K
Capitalization21.85B
White Mountains Insurance Group
Price$2025.55
Change-$1.86 (-0.09%)
Volume$16.71K
Capitalization5.15B
L vs WTM Comparison Chart in %
L
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WTM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
L vs. WTM commentary
Dec 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is L is a StrongBuy and WTM is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 04, 2025
Stock price -- (L: $106.32 vs. WTM: $2027.07)
Brand notoriety: L and WTM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: L: 27% vs. WTM: 40%
Market capitalization -- L: $21.85B vs. WTM: $5.15B
L [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $21.85B. WTM’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $5.15B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $133.2B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $17.54B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

L’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileWTM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • L’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • WTM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both L and WTM are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

L’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WTM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • L’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • WTM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, L is a better buy in the short-term than WTM.

Price Growth

L (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а -1.51% price change this week, while WTM (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was +1.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was -1.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.90%.

Reported Earning Dates

L is expected to report earnings on Feb 09, 2026.

WTM is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (-1.66% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
L($21.9B) has a higher market cap than WTM($5.15B). WTM has higher P/E ratio than L: WTM (37.30) vs L (15.33). L YTD gains are higher at: 25.797 vs. WTM (4.272). L has more cash in the bank: 6.51B vs. WTM (1.46B). WTM has less debt than L: WTM (590M) vs L (8.95B). L has higher revenues than WTM: L (17.8B) vs WTM (2.58B).
LWTML / WTM
Capitalization21.9B5.15B425%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD25.7974.272604%
P/E Ratio15.3337.3041%
Revenue17.8B2.58B690%
Total Cash6.51B1.46B445%
Total Debt8.95B590M1,516%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
L vs WTM: Fundamental Ratings
L
WTM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
511
SMR RATING
1..100
9792
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
1848
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
163
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
65n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

L's Valuation (76) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as WTM (90). This means that L’s stock grew similarly to WTM’s over the last 12 months.

L's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as WTM (11). This means that L’s stock grew similarly to WTM’s over the last 12 months.

WTM's SMR Rating (92) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as L (97). This means that WTM’s stock grew similarly to L’s over the last 12 months.

L's Price Growth Rating (18) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as WTM (48). This means that L’s stock grew similarly to WTM’s over the last 12 months.

WTM's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as L (16). This means that WTM’s stock grew similarly to L’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LWTM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
30%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
53%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
49%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
40%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
L
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WTM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BRAZ28.970.51
+1.80%
Global X Brazil Active ETF
ILF31.500.51
+1.63%
iShares Latin America 40 ETF
ACLC78.620.26
+0.33%
American Century Large Cap Equity ETF
XDTE43.580.11
+0.25%
Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Cov Cll Strat ETF
IBIG26.470.02
+0.08%
iShares iBonds Oct 2030 Term Tips ETF

L and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, L has been closely correlated with HIG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if L jumps, then HIG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To L
1D Price
Change %
L100%
-0.08%
HIG - L
86%
Closely correlated
-0.30%
CINF - L
83%
Closely correlated
-1.39%
CNA - L
82%
Closely correlated
+0.06%
TRV - L
80%
Closely correlated
-0.66%
ORI - L
79%
Closely correlated
-1.48%
More

WTM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WTM has been loosely correlated with THG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WTM jumps, then THG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WTM
1D Price
Change %
WTM100%
+0.11%
THG - WTM
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.76%
HIG - WTM
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.30%
CINF - WTM
54%
Loosely correlated
-1.39%
TRV - WTM
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.66%
L - WTM
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.08%
More