L
Price
$91.66
Change
+$0.40 (+0.44%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
17.4B
8 days until earnings call
WRB
Price
$68.99
Change
+$0.45 (+0.66%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
22.69B
92 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

L vs WRB

Header iconL vs WRB Comparison
Open Charts L vs WRBBanner chart's image
Loews
Price$91.66
Change+$0.40 (+0.44%)
Volume$436.66K
Capitalization17.4B
WR Berkley
Price$68.99
Change+$0.45 (+0.66%)
Volume$1.37M
Capitalization22.69B
L vs WRB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WRB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
L vs. WRB commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is L is a Hold and WRB is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (L: $91.66 vs. WRB: $68.99)
Brand notoriety: L and WRB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: L: 51% vs. WRB: 74%
Market capitalization -- L: $17.4B vs. WRB: $22.69B
L [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $17.4B. WRB’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $22.69B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $121.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $14.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

L’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileWRB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • L’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • WRB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, L is a better buy in the long-term than WRB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

L’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WRB’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • L’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WRB’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WRB is a better buy in the short-term than L.

Price Growth

L (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а -0.78% price change this week, while WRB (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was +0.35% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was -0.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.23%.

Reported Earning Dates

L is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2025.

WRB is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (-0.24% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WRB($22.7B) has a higher market cap than L($17.4B). WRB has higher P/E ratio than L: WRB (17.32) vs L (12.32). WRB YTD gains are higher at: 18.993 vs. L (8.386). L has more cash in the bank: 45.2B vs. WRB (21.5B). WRB has less debt than L: WRB (2.84B) vs L (9B). L has higher revenues than WRB: L (15.7B) vs WRB (12.1B).
LWRBL / WRB
Capitalization17.4B22.7B77%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD8.38618.99344%
P/E Ratio12.3217.3271%
Revenue15.7B12.1B130%
Total Cash45.2B21.5B210%
Total Debt9B2.84B317%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
L vs WRB: Fundamental Ratings
L
WRB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
299
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
74
SMR RATING
1..100
9890
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3151
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2438
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

L's Valuation (70) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as WRB (97). This means that L’s stock grew similarly to WRB’s over the last 12 months.

WRB's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as L (7). This means that WRB’s stock grew similarly to L’s over the last 12 months.

WRB's SMR Rating (90) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as L (98). This means that WRB’s stock grew similarly to L’s over the last 12 months.

L's Price Growth Rating (31) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as WRB (51). This means that L’s stock grew similarly to WRB’s over the last 12 months.

L's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as WRB (38). This means that L’s stock grew similarly to WRB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LWRB
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
40%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
31%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WRB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FAS177.413.73
+2.15%
Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X ETF
BRNY45.740.19
+0.43%
Burney U.S. Factor Rotation ETF
GBUY37.89N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Future Consumer Equity ETF
MYMI24.29N/A
N/A
SPDR SSGA My2029 Municipal Bond ETF
DUST22.84-0.43
-1.85%
Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bear 2X ETF

L and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, L has been closely correlated with CNA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if L jumps, then CNA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To L
1D Price
Change %
L100%
+0.44%
CNA - L
86%
Closely correlated
+1.07%
CINF - L
84%
Closely correlated
+1.03%
HIG - L
83%
Closely correlated
+0.25%
THG - L
77%
Closely correlated
+2.31%
TRV - L
76%
Closely correlated
-0.36%
More

WRB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WRB has been closely correlated with HIG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WRB jumps, then HIG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WRB
1D Price
Change %
WRB100%
+0.66%
HIG - WRB
74%
Closely correlated
+0.25%
TRV - WRB
74%
Closely correlated
-0.36%
L - WRB
71%
Closely correlated
+0.44%
RLI - WRB
70%
Closely correlated
N/A
CB - WRB
70%
Closely correlated
-0.38%
More