L
Price
$107.33
Change
-$0.18 (-0.17%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
22.18B
45 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WRB
Price
$70.64
Change
+$0.41 (+0.58%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
26.84B
27 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

L vs WRB

Header iconL vs WRB Comparison
Open Charts L vs WRBBanner chart's image
Loews
Price$107.33
Change-$0.18 (-0.17%)
Volume$323.55K
Capitalization22.18B
WR Berkley
Price$70.64
Change+$0.41 (+0.58%)
Volume$1.68M
Capitalization26.84B
L vs WRB Comparison Chart in %
L
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WRB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
L vs. WRB commentary
Dec 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is L is a Buy and WRB is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 26, 2025
Stock price -- (L: $107.33 vs. WRB: $70.64)
Brand notoriety: L and WRB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: L: 40% vs. WRB: 49%
Market capitalization -- L: $22.18B vs. WRB: $26.84B
L [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $22.18B. WRB’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $26.84B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $133.45B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $18.24B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

L’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileWRB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • L’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • WRB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, L is a better buy in the long-term than WRB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

L’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WRB’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • L’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • WRB’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, L is a better buy in the short-term than WRB.

Price Growth

L (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а +1.22% price change this week, while WRB (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was +2.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +0.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.18%.

Reported Earning Dates

L is expected to report earnings on Feb 09, 2026.

WRB is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (+0.75% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WRB($26.8B) has a higher market cap than L($22.2B). L (15.56) and WRB (14.84) have similar P/E ratio . L YTD gains are higher at: 26.998 vs. WRB (21.988). WRB has more cash in the bank: 27.3B vs. L (7.22B). WRB has less debt than L: WRB (2.84B) vs L (9.44B). L has higher revenues than WRB: L (18B) vs WRB (14.6B).
LWRBL / WRB
Capitalization22.2B26.8B83%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD26.99821.988123%
P/E Ratio15.5614.84105%
Revenue18B14.6B123%
Total Cash7.22B27.3B26%
Total Debt9.44B2.84B333%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
L vs WRB: Fundamental Ratings
L
WRB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8654
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
73
Overvalued
94
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
76
SMR RATING
1..100
9779
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3260
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1751
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

L's Valuation (73) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as WRB (94). This means that L’s stock grew similarly to WRB’s over the last 12 months.

WRB's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as L (7). This means that WRB’s stock grew similarly to L’s over the last 12 months.

WRB's SMR Rating (79) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as L (97). This means that WRB’s stock grew similarly to L’s over the last 12 months.

L's Price Growth Rating (32) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as WRB (60). This means that L’s stock grew similarly to WRB’s over the last 12 months.

L's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WRB (51). This means that L’s stock grew somewhat faster than WRB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LWRB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
37%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
40%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
L
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WRB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KNOW11.470.04
+0.31%
Fundamentals First ETF
PFL8.360.02
+0.24%
PIMCO Income Strategy Fund
SMMD76.650.08
+0.10%
iShares Russell 2500 ETF
XBOC33.660.03
+0.10%
Innovator US Eq Acclrtd 9 Bffr ETF™ Oct
SAWS21.40N/A
N/A
AAM Sawgrass U.S. Sm Cp Qual Gr ETF

L and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, L has been closely correlated with HIG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if L jumps, then HIG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To L
1D Price
Change %
L100%
-0.17%
HIG - L
86%
Closely correlated
+0.46%
CINF - L
82%
Closely correlated
+0.05%
CNA - L
82%
Closely correlated
+0.06%
ORI - L
79%
Closely correlated
+0.37%
TRV - L
78%
Closely correlated
+0.47%
More

WRB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WRB has been closely correlated with HIG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WRB jumps, then HIG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WRB
1D Price
Change %
WRB100%
+0.58%
HIG - WRB
74%
Closely correlated
+0.46%
TRV - WRB
71%
Closely correlated
+0.47%
L - WRB
70%
Closely correlated
-0.17%
AXS - WRB
67%
Closely correlated
-0.19%
CB - WRB
67%
Closely correlated
+0.01%
More