L
Price
$91.66
Change
+$0.40 (+0.44%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
17.4B
8 days until earnings call
UFCS
Price
$26.89
Change
-$0.01 (-0.04%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
550.29M
9 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

L vs UFCS

Header iconL vs UFCS Comparison
Open Charts L vs UFCSBanner chart's image
Loews
Price$91.66
Change+$0.40 (+0.44%)
Volume$436.66K
Capitalization17.4B
United Fire Group
Price$26.89
Change-$0.01 (-0.04%)
Volume$77.47K
Capitalization550.29M
L vs UFCS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UFCS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
L vs. UFCS commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is L is a Hold and UFCS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (L: $91.66 vs. UFCS: $26.89)
Brand notoriety: L and UFCS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: L: 51% vs. UFCS: 65%
Market capitalization -- L: $17.4B vs. UFCS: $550.29M
L [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $17.4B. UFCS’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $550.29M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $121.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $14.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

L’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileUFCS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • L’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • UFCS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, L is a better buy in the long-term than UFCS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

L’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UFCS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • L’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • UFCS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, L is a better buy in the short-term than UFCS.

Price Growth

L (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а -0.78% price change this week, while UFCS (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -1.93% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was -0.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.23%.

Reported Earning Dates

L is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2025.

UFCS is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (-0.24% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
L($17.4B) has a higher market cap than UFCS($550M). UFCS has higher P/E ratio than L: UFCS (41.53) vs L (12.32). L YTD gains are higher at: 8.386 vs. UFCS (-4.408). L has more cash in the bank: 45.2B vs. UFCS (102M). UFCS has less debt than L: UFCS (50M) vs L (9B). L has higher revenues than UFCS: L (15.7B) vs UFCS (1.1B).
LUFCSL / UFCS
Capitalization17.4B550M3,164%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD8.386-4.408-190%
P/E Ratio12.3241.5330%
Revenue15.7B1.1B1,430%
Total Cash45.2B102M44,314%
Total Debt9B50M18,006%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
L vs UFCS: Fundamental Ratings
L
UFCS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1761
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
40
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
782
SMR RATING
1..100
9880
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3356
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2476
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UFCS's Valuation (40) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as L (70). This means that UFCS’s stock grew similarly to L’s over the last 12 months.

L's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for UFCS (82). This means that L’s stock grew significantly faster than UFCS’s over the last 12 months.

UFCS's SMR Rating (80) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as L (98). This means that UFCS’s stock grew similarly to L’s over the last 12 months.

L's Price Growth Rating (33) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as UFCS (56). This means that L’s stock grew similarly to UFCS’s over the last 12 months.

L's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UFCS (76). This means that L’s stock grew somewhat faster than UFCS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LUFCS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UFCS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BMDIX23.660.18
+0.77%
Baird Mid Cap Growth Institutional
UIVMX12.750.08
+0.63%
MFS Intrinsic Value R1
ORSIX14.79N/A
N/A
North Square Dynamic Small Cap I
AMAGX85.75N/A
N/A
Amana Growth Investor
FGEAX27.22N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Glbl Capital Apprec A

L and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, L has been closely correlated with CNA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if L jumps, then CNA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To L
1D Price
Change %
L100%
+0.44%
CNA - L
86%
Closely correlated
+1.07%
CINF - L
84%
Closely correlated
+1.03%
HIG - L
83%
Closely correlated
+0.25%
THG - L
77%
Closely correlated
+2.31%
TRV - L
76%
Closely correlated
-0.36%
More

UFCS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UFCS has been closely correlated with SAFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UFCS jumps, then SAFT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UFCS
1D Price
Change %
UFCS100%
-0.04%
SAFT - UFCS
67%
Closely correlated
+0.21%
CINF - UFCS
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.03%
L - UFCS
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.44%
AFG - UFCS
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.35%
THG - UFCS
60%
Loosely correlated
+2.31%
More