L
Price
$103.57
Change
+$0.80 (+0.78%)
Updated
Jan 14, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
21.41B
25 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
THG
Price
$170.66
Change
+$3.09 (+1.84%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
6.07B
19 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

L vs THG

Header iconL vs THG Comparison
Open Charts L vs THGBanner chart's image
Loews
Price$103.57
Change+$0.80 (+0.78%)
Volume$11.82K
Capitalization21.41B
Hanover Insurance Group (The)
Price$170.66
Change+$3.09 (+1.84%)
Volume$753.06K
Capitalization6.07B
L vs THG Comparison Chart in %
L
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
THG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
L vs. THG commentary
Jan 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is L is a Hold and THG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 15, 2026
Stock price -- (L: $102.77 vs. THG: $167.57)
Brand notoriety: L and THG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: L: 75% vs. THG: 223%
Market capitalization -- L: $21.24B vs. THG: $5.96B
L [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $21.24B. THG’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $5.96B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $120.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $17.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

L’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileTHG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • L’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • THG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, L is a better buy in the long-term than THG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

L’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while THG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • L’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • THG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, L is a better buy in the short-term than THG.

Price Growth

L (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а -2.30% price change this week, while THG (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -5.42% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was -0.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.24%.

Reported Earning Dates

L is expected to report earnings on Feb 09, 2026.

THG is expected to report earnings on Feb 03, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (-0.93% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
L($21.4B) has a higher market cap than THG($6.07B). L has higher P/E ratio than THG: L (15.01) vs THG (9.87). L YTD gains are higher at: -2.412 vs. THG (-6.626). THG has less debt than L: THG (1.28B) vs L (9.44B). L has higher revenues than THG: L (18B) vs THG (6.48B).
LTHGL / THG
Capitalization21.4B6.07B352%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-2.412-6.62636%
P/E Ratio15.019.87152%
Revenue18B6.48B278%
Total Cash7.22BN/A-
Total Debt9.44B1.28B738%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
L vs THG: Fundamental Ratings
L
THG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7055
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
75
Overvalued
41
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
833
SMR RATING
1..100
9752
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3256
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1988
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

THG's Valuation (41) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for L (75). This means that THG’s stock grew somewhat faster than L’s over the last 12 months.

L's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as THG (33). This means that L’s stock grew similarly to THG’s over the last 12 months.

THG's SMR Rating (52) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for L (97). This means that THG’s stock grew somewhat faster than L’s over the last 12 months.

L's Price Growth Rating (32) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as THG (56). This means that L’s stock grew similarly to THG’s over the last 12 months.

L's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for THG (88). This means that L’s stock grew significantly faster than THG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LTHG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 28 days ago
52%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
43%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
L
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
THG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PGZ10.250.08
+0.79%
PRINCIPAL REAL ESTATE Income FUND
ZTR6.300.01
+0.16%
Virtus Total Return Fund
IAUG28.88-0.05
-0.18%
Innovator Intl Dev Pwr Bffr ETF - Aug
QTR30.88-0.06
-0.19%
Global X NASDAQ 100® Tail Risk ETF
IYG91.93-1.52
-1.63%
iShares US Financial Services ETF

L and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, L has been closely correlated with HIG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if L jumps, then HIG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To L
1D Price
Change %
L100%
-1.67%
HIG - L
86%
Closely correlated
-2.51%
CINF - L
83%
Closely correlated
-1.60%
CNA - L
82%
Closely correlated
-2.07%
ORI - L
78%
Closely correlated
-1.60%
TRV - L
78%
Closely correlated
-3.31%
More

THG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, THG has been closely correlated with HIG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if THG jumps, then HIG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To THG
1D Price
Change %
THG100%
+1.84%
HIG - THG
81%
Closely correlated
+0.06%
CINF - THG
79%
Closely correlated
+1.66%
TRV - THG
78%
Closely correlated
+0.57%
L - THG
77%
Closely correlated
+0.81%
CNA - THG
77%
Closely correlated
+1.67%
More