L
Price
$95.95
Change
+$1.36 (+1.44%)
Updated
Aug 19 closing price
Capitalization
19.9B
75 days until earnings call
QBIEY
Price
$13.93
Change
+$0.12 (+0.87%)
Updated
Aug 18 closing price
Capitalization
21.24B
Interact to see
Advertisement

L vs QBIEY

Header iconL vs QBIEY Comparison
Open Charts L vs QBIEYBanner chart's image
Loews
Price$95.95
Change+$1.36 (+1.44%)
Volume$750.89K
Capitalization19.9B
QBE Insurance Group
Price$13.93
Change+$0.12 (+0.87%)
Volume$38.99K
Capitalization21.24B
L vs QBIEY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QBIEY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
L vs. QBIEY commentary
Aug 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is L is a Buy and QBIEY is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 20, 2025
Stock price -- (L: $94.59 vs. QBIEY: $13.93)
Brand notoriety: L and QBIEY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: L: 101% vs. QBIEY: 129%
Market capitalization -- L: $19.9B vs. QBIEY: $21.01B
L [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $19.9B. QBIEY’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $21.01B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $146.93B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $17.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

L’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileQBIEY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • L’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • QBIEY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, QBIEY is a better buy in the long-term than L.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

L’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QBIEY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • L’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • QBIEY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, L is a better buy in the short-term than QBIEY.

Price Growth

L (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а +0.97% price change this week, while QBIEY (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was +1.79% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +0.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.82%.

Reported Earning Dates

L is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (+0.91% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QBIEY($21.2B) has a higher market cap than L($19.9B). L has higher P/E ratio than QBIEY: L (15.23) vs QBIEY (10.49). QBIEY YTD gains are higher at: 21.048 vs. L (13.459). L has more cash in the bank: 6.51B vs. QBIEY (1.64B). QBIEY has less debt than L: QBIEY (2.9B) vs L (8.95B). QBIEY has higher revenues than L: QBIEY (19.2B) vs L (17.8B).
LQBIEYL / QBIEY
Capitalization19.9B21.2B94%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD13.45921.04864%
P/E Ratio15.2310.49145%
Revenue17.8B19.2B93%
Total Cash6.51B1.64B397%
Total Debt8.95B2.9B309%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
L vs QBIEY: Fundamental Ratings
L
QBIEY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1684
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
712
SMR RATING
1..100
9794
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
2455
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2337
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

QBIEY's Valuation (26) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for L (71) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that QBIEY’s stock grew somewhat faster than L’s over the last 12 months.

L's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as QBIEY (12) in the null industry. This means that L’s stock grew similarly to QBIEY’s over the last 12 months.

QBIEY's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as L (97) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that QBIEY’s stock grew similarly to L’s over the last 12 months.

L's Price Growth Rating (24) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as QBIEY (55) in the null industry. This means that L’s stock grew similarly to QBIEY’s over the last 12 months.

L's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as QBIEY (37) in the null industry. This means that L’s stock grew similarly to QBIEY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LQBIEY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QBIEY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EPAC42.410.65
+1.56%
Enerpac Tool Group Corp
ENTX2.00N/A
N/A
Entera Bio Ltd
JLL292.92-1.18
-0.40%
Jones Lang LaSalle
AMBR5.34-0.25
-4.47%
Amber International Holding Limited
WINT0.49-0.03
-5.31%
Windtree Therapeutics Inc.

L and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, L has been closely correlated with CNA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if L jumps, then CNA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To L
1D Price
Change %
L100%
+1.44%
CNA - L
87%
Closely correlated
+2.69%
HIG - L
85%
Closely correlated
+1.58%
CINF - L
84%
Closely correlated
+1.73%
ORI - L
83%
Closely correlated
+2.60%
THG - L
78%
Closely correlated
+1.73%
More

QBIEY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QBIEY has been loosely correlated with BNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QBIEY jumps, then BNT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QBIEY
1D Price
Change %
QBIEY100%
+0.83%
BNT - QBIEY
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.28%
DGICB - QBIEY
22%
Poorly correlated
-4.36%
STC - QBIEY
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.27%
PRA - QBIEY
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.17%
L - QBIEY
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.43%
More