L
Price
$92.39
Change
+$1.05 (+1.15%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
17.4B
28 days until earnings call
QBIEY
Price
$14.84
Change
-$0.38 (-2.50%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
15.75B
Interact to see
Advertisement

L vs QBIEY

Header iconL vs QBIEY Comparison
Open Charts L vs QBIEYBanner chart's image
Loews
Price$92.39
Change+$1.05 (+1.15%)
Volume$500.77K
Capitalization17.4B
QBE Insurance Group
Price$14.84
Change-$0.38 (-2.50%)
Volume$18.96K
Capitalization15.75B
L vs QBIEY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QBIEY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
L vs. QBIEY commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is L is a Buy and QBIEY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (L: $92.39 vs. QBIEY: $14.84)
Brand notoriety: L and QBIEY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: L: 64% vs. QBIEY: 79%
Market capitalization -- L: $17.4B vs. QBIEY: $15.75B
L [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $17.4B. QBIEY’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $15.75B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $121.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $14.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

L’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileQBIEY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • L’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • QBIEY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, QBIEY is a better buy in the long-term than L.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

L’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QBIEY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • L’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • QBIEY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, L is a better buy in the short-term than QBIEY.

Price Growth

L (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а +2.61% price change this week, while QBIEY (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -3.57% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was -0.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.76%.

Reported Earning Dates

L is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (-0.74% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
L($17.4B) has a higher market cap than QBIEY($15.8B). QBIEY has higher P/E ratio than L: QBIEY (20.12) vs L (12.32). QBIEY YTD gains are higher at: 29.002 vs. L (9.249). L has more cash in the bank: 45.2B vs. QBIEY (833M). QBIEY has less debt than L: QBIEY (3.05B) vs L (9B). L has higher revenues than QBIEY: L (15.7B) vs QBIEY (13.4B).
LQBIEYL / QBIEY
Capitalization17.4B15.8B110%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD9.24929.00232%
P/E Ratio12.3220.1261%
Revenue15.7B13.4B117%
Total Cash45.2B833M5,426%
Total Debt9B3.05B296%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
L vs QBIEY: Fundamental Ratings
L
QBIEY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
87
SMR RATING
1..100
9896
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3146
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2162
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

QBIEY's Valuation (31) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for L (71) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that QBIEY’s stock grew somewhat faster than L’s over the last 12 months.

QBIEY's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the null industry is in the same range as L (8) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that QBIEY’s stock grew similarly to L’s over the last 12 months.

QBIEY's SMR Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as L (98) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that QBIEY’s stock grew similarly to L’s over the last 12 months.

L's Price Growth Rating (31) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as QBIEY (46) in the null industry. This means that L’s stock grew similarly to QBIEY’s over the last 12 months.

L's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QBIEY (62) in the null industry. This means that L’s stock grew somewhat faster than QBIEY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LQBIEY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
52%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QBIEY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AVAH4.650.19
+4.26%
Aveanna Healthcare Holdings
MNY1.070.04
+3.88%
MoneyHero Limited
MEDP321.500.43
+0.14%
Medpace Holdings
UPST73.39N/A
N/A
Upstart Holdings
MBRX0.34-0.01
-2.16%
Moleculin Biotech

L and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, L has been closely correlated with CNA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if L jumps, then CNA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To L
1D Price
Change %
L100%
+1.15%
CNA - L
85%
Closely correlated
+0.53%
CINF - L
84%
Closely correlated
+1.70%
HIG - L
83%
Closely correlated
+1.70%
THG - L
77%
Closely correlated
+1.17%
TRV - L
76%
Closely correlated
N/A
More

QBIEY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QBIEY has been loosely correlated with BNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QBIEY jumps, then BNT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QBIEY
1D Price
Change %
QBIEY100%
-2.50%
BNT - QBIEY
34%
Loosely correlated
+2.52%
DGICB - QBIEY
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
STC - QBIEY
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.06%
PRA - QBIEY
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.87%
L - QBIEY
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.15%
More