L
Price
$92.39
Change
+$1.05 (+1.15%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
17.4B
29 days until earnings call
PRA
Price
$23.63
Change
+$0.66 (+2.87%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
650.38M
31 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

L vs PRA

Header iconL vs PRA Comparison
Open Charts L vs PRABanner chart's image
Loews
Price$92.39
Change+$1.05 (+1.15%)
Volume$500.77K
Capitalization17.4B
ProAssurance
Price$23.63
Change+$0.66 (+2.87%)
Volume$2.86M
Capitalization650.38M
L vs PRA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PRA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
L vs. PRA commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is L is a Buy and PRA is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (L: $92.39 vs. PRA: $23.63)
Brand notoriety: L and PRA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: L: 64% vs. PRA: 515%
Market capitalization -- L: $17.4B vs. PRA: $650.38M
L [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $17.4B. PRA’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $650.38M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $121.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $14.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

L’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whilePRA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • L’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • PRA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, L is a better buy in the long-term than PRA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

L’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PRA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • L’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • PRA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, L is a better buy in the short-term than PRA.

Price Growth

L (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а +2.61% price change this week, while PRA (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was +3.28% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +0.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.59%.

Reported Earning Dates

L is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2025.

PRA is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (+0.43% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
L($17.4B) has a higher market cap than PRA($650M). PRA has higher P/E ratio than L: PRA (105.26) vs L (12.32). PRA YTD gains are higher at: 48.523 vs. L (9.249). L has more cash in the bank: 45.2B vs. PRA (3.8B). PRA has less debt than L: PRA (444M) vs L (9B). L has higher revenues than PRA: L (15.7B) vs PRA (1.13B).
LPRAL / PRA
Capitalization17.4B650M2,677%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD9.24948.52319%
P/E Ratio12.32105.2612%
Revenue15.7B1.13B1,389%
Total Cash45.2B3.8B1,191%
Total Debt9B444M2,028%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
L vs PRA: Fundamental Ratings
L
PRA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
863
SMR RATING
1..100
9890
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3141
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2120
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

L's Valuation (71) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as PRA (96) in the Specialty Insurance industry. This means that L’s stock grew similarly to PRA’s over the last 12 months.

L's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PRA (63) in the Specialty Insurance industry. This means that L’s stock grew somewhat faster than PRA’s over the last 12 months.

PRA's SMR Rating (90) in the Specialty Insurance industry is in the same range as L (98) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that PRA’s stock grew similarly to L’s over the last 12 months.

L's Price Growth Rating (31) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as PRA (41) in the Specialty Insurance industry. This means that L’s stock grew similarly to PRA’s over the last 12 months.

PRA's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the Specialty Insurance industry is in the same range as L (21) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that PRA’s stock grew similarly to L’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LPRA
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
32%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PRA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WSTAX59.950.54
+0.91%
Macquarie Science and Technology A
ETLCX14.930.13
+0.88%
Eventide Large Cap Focus C
MUECX34.800.28
+0.81%
MFS Blended Research Core Equity C
OWLLX11.010.07
+0.64%
Channing Intrinsic Value Sm-Cp Instl
HFCIX52.490.26
+0.50%
Hennessy Focus Institutional

L and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, L has been closely correlated with CNA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if L jumps, then CNA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To L
1D Price
Change %
L100%
+1.15%
CNA - L
85%
Closely correlated
+0.53%
CINF - L
84%
Closely correlated
+1.70%
HIG - L
83%
Closely correlated
+1.70%
THG - L
77%
Closely correlated
+1.17%
TRV - L
76%
Closely correlated
+2.64%
More

PRA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PRA has been loosely correlated with UFCS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PRA jumps, then UFCS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PRA
1D Price
Change %
PRA100%
+2.87%
UFCS - PRA
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.77%
SAFT - PRA
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.52%
L - PRA
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.15%
HMN - PRA
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.62%
BNT - PRA
28%
Poorly correlated
+2.52%
More