L
Price
$88.66
Change
-$0.52 (-0.58%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
17.4B
50 days until earnings call
PLMR
Price
$160.93
Change
-$0.14 (-0.09%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
2.08B
45 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

L vs PLMR

Header iconL vs PLMR Comparison
Open Charts L vs PLMRBanner chart's image
Loews
Price$88.66
Change-$0.52 (-0.58%)
Volume$783.11K
Capitalization17.4B
Palomar Holdings
Price$160.93
Change-$0.14 (-0.09%)
Volume$182.94K
Capitalization2.08B
L vs PLMR Comparison Chart
Loading...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PLMR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
L vs. PLMR commentary
Jun 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is L is a Hold and PLMR is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 15, 2025
Stock price -- (L: $88.66 vs. PLMR: $160.93)
Brand notoriety: L and PLMR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: L: 112% vs. PLMR: 59%
Market capitalization -- L: $17.4B vs. PLMR: $2.08B
L [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $17.4B. PLMR’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $2.08B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $121.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $14.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

L’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePLMR’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • L’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PLMR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PLMR is a better buy in the long-term than L.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

L’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PLMR’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • L’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PLMR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, L is a better buy in the short-term than PLMR.

Price Growth

L (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а -0.54% price change this week, while PLMR (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -3.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was -0.99%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.64%.

Reported Earning Dates

L is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2025.

PLMR is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (-0.99% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
L($17.4B) has a higher market cap than PLMR($2.09B). PLMR has higher P/E ratio than L: PLMR (26.26) vs L (12.32). PLMR YTD gains are higher at: 52.410 vs. L (4.838). L has more cash in the bank: 45.2B vs. PLMR (695M). PLMR has less debt than L: PLMR (52.6M) vs L (9B). L has higher revenues than PLMR: L (15.7B) vs PLMR (376M).
LPLMRL / PLMR
Capitalization17.4B2.09B835%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD4.83852.4109%
P/E Ratio12.3226.2647%
Revenue15.7B376M4,176%
Total Cash45.2B695M6,504%
Total Debt9B52.6M17,116%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
L vs PLMR: Fundamental Ratings
L
PLMR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
95
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
631
SMR RATING
1..100
9845
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3539
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2016
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

L's Valuation (70) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as PLMR (95). This means that L’s stock grew similarly to PLMR’s over the last 12 months.

L's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as PLMR (31). This means that L’s stock grew similarly to PLMR’s over the last 12 months.

PLMR's SMR Rating (45) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for L (98). This means that PLMR’s stock grew somewhat faster than L’s over the last 12 months.

L's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as PLMR (39). This means that L’s stock grew similarly to PLMR’s over the last 12 months.

PLMR's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as L (20). This means that PLMR’s stock grew similarly to L’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LPLMR
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PLMR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JANW34.27-0.17
-0.51%
AllianzIM US Large Cap Buffer20 Jan ETF
JGRSX12.68-0.13
-1.01%
JHancock Global Shareholder Yield R6
QGRO104.47-1.45
-1.37%
American Century US Quality Growth ETF
JHJRX23.14-0.33
-1.41%
JHancock ESG Large Cap Core R6
MCSPX11.27-0.18
-1.57%
BlackRock Advantage SMID Cap Inv C

L and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, L has been closely correlated with CNA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if L jumps, then CNA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To L
1D Price
Change %
L100%
-0.58%
CNA - L
84%
Closely correlated
-0.98%
CINF - L
84%
Closely correlated
-1.27%
HIG - L
83%
Closely correlated
-0.82%
TRV - L
77%
Closely correlated
-0.93%
CB - L
75%
Closely correlated
-0.53%
More

PLMR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PLMR has been loosely correlated with SKWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PLMR jumps, then SKWD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PLMR
1D Price
Change %
PLMR100%
-0.09%
SKWD - PLMR
61%
Loosely correlated
-2.06%
RLI - PLMR
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.80%
L - PLMR
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.58%
CINF - PLMR
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.27%
ALL - PLMR
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.70%
More