L
Price
$98.83
Change
+$0.66 (+0.67%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
20.5B
15 days until earnings call
MCY
Price
$79.78
Change
+$1.14 (+1.45%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
4.42B
16 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

L vs MCY

Header iconL vs MCY Comparison
Open Charts L vs MCYBanner chart's image
Loews
Price$98.83
Change+$0.66 (+0.67%)
Volume$665.63K
Capitalization20.5B
Mercury General
Price$79.78
Change+$1.14 (+1.45%)
Volume$175.76K
Capitalization4.42B
L vs MCY Comparison Chart in %
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
L vs. MCY commentary
Oct 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is L is a Hold and MCY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 19, 2025
Stock price -- (L: $98.83 vs. MCY: $79.78)
Brand notoriety: L and MCY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: L: 84% vs. MCY: 77%
Market capitalization -- L: $20.5B vs. MCY: $4.42B
L [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $20.5B. MCY’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $4.42B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $132.3B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $17.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

L’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMCY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • L’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MCY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MCY is a better buy in the long-term than L.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

L’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • L’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MCY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, L is a better buy in the short-term than MCY.

Price Growth

L (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а -2.01% price change this week, while MCY (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -0.45% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was -1.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.45%.

Reported Earning Dates

L is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2025.

MCY is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (-1.11% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
L($20.5B) has a higher market cap than MCY($4.42B). L has higher P/E ratio than MCY: L (15.69) vs MCY (11.33). MCY YTD gains are higher at: 21.794 vs. L (16.940). MCY has less debt than L: MCY (590M) vs L (8.95B). L has higher revenues than MCY: L (17.8B) vs MCY (5.77B).
LMCYL / MCY
Capitalization20.5B4.42B464%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD16.94021.79478%
P/E Ratio15.6911.33138%
Revenue17.8B5.77B309%
Total Cash6.51BN/A-
Total Debt8.95B590M1,516%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
L vs MCY: Fundamental Ratings
L
MCY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3492
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
55
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
633
SMR RATING
1..100
9748
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3444
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1910
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MCY's Valuation (55) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as L (72). This means that MCY’s stock grew similarly to L’s over the last 12 months.

L's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as MCY (33). This means that L’s stock grew similarly to MCY’s over the last 12 months.

MCY's SMR Rating (48) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for L (97). This means that MCY’s stock grew somewhat faster than L’s over the last 12 months.

L's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as MCY (44). This means that L’s stock grew similarly to MCY’s over the last 12 months.

MCY's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as L (19). This means that MCY’s stock grew similarly to L’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LMCY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
28%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SMOT35.860.14
+0.39%
VanEck Morningstar SMID Moat ETF
MMLG35.750.01
+0.03%
First Trust Multi-Manager Large Gr ETF
EQRR62.33N/A
N/A
ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF
QQHG58.30N/A
N/A
Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF
TY33.71-0.07
-0.21%
TRI-Continental Corp

L and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, L has been closely correlated with HIG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if L jumps, then HIG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To L
1D Price
Change %
L100%
+0.67%
HIG - L
85%
Closely correlated
+0.38%
CINF - L
83%
Closely correlated
+1.08%
CNA - L
82%
Closely correlated
+0.89%
ORI - L
79%
Closely correlated
+1.42%
THG - L
78%
Closely correlated
+1.57%
More

MCY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCY has been loosely correlated with CINF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCY jumps, then CINF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCY
1D Price
Change %
MCY100%
+1.45%
CINF - MCY
57%
Loosely correlated
+1.08%
THG - MCY
57%
Loosely correlated
+1.57%
HIG - MCY
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.38%
UFCS - MCY
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.46%
L - MCY
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.67%
More