KWIPF
Price
$0.56
Change
+$0.08 (+16.67%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
915.7M
LNSPF
Price
$2.80
Change
+$0.07 (+2.56%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
2.34B
Interact to see
Advertisement

KWIPF vs LNSPF

Header iconKWIPF vs LNSPF Comparison
Open Charts KWIPF vs LNSPFBanner chart's image
Kiwi Property Group
Price$0.56
Change+$0.08 (+16.67%)
Volume$13K
Capitalization915.7M
London & Stamford Property
Price$2.80
Change+$0.07 (+2.56%)
Volume$1.54K
Capitalization2.34B
KWIPF vs LNSPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
KWIPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LNSPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KWIPF vs. LNSPF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KWIPF is a Hold and LNSPF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (KWIPF: $0.56 vs. LNSPF: $2.80)
Brand notoriety: KWIPF and LNSPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KWIPF: 384% vs. LNSPF: 100%
Market capitalization -- KWIPF: $915.7M vs. LNSPF: $2.34B
KWIPF [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $915.7M. LNSPF’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $2.34B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KWIPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLNSPF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • KWIPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LNSPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, KWIPF is a better buy in the long-term than LNSPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KWIPF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LNSPF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KWIPF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • LNSPF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LNSPF is a better buy in the short-term than KWIPF.

Price Growth

KWIPF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а +16.09% price change this week, while LNSPF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was +2.36% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +1.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.74%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+1.40% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LNSPF($2.34B) has a higher market cap than KWIPF($916M). LNSPF has higher P/E ratio than KWIPF: LNSPF (7.23) vs KWIPF (5.54). LNSPF YTD gains are higher at: 24.151 vs. KWIPF (15.298). KWIPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -169.77M vs. LNSPF (-477.5M). LNSPF has more cash in the bank: 23.9M vs. KWIPF (17.9M). LNSPF has less debt than KWIPF: LNSPF (1.02B) vs KWIPF (1.14B). KWIPF has higher revenues than LNSPF: KWIPF (257M) vs LNSPF (147M).
KWIPFLNSPFKWIPF / LNSPF
Capitalization916M2.34B39%
EBITDA-169.77M-477.5M36%
Gain YTD15.29824.15163%
P/E Ratio5.547.2377%
Revenue257M147M175%
Total Cash17.9M23.9M75%
Total Debt1.14B1.02B112%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KWIPF vs LNSPF: Fundamental Ratings
KWIPF
LNSPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
47
Fair valued
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10081
SMR RATING
1..100
9393
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4846
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2191
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5030

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KWIPF's Valuation (47) in the null industry is in the same range as LNSPF (79). This means that KWIPF’s stock grew similarly to LNSPF’s over the last 12 months.

LNSPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (81) in the null industry is in the same range as KWIPF (100). This means that LNSPF’s stock grew similarly to KWIPF’s over the last 12 months.

LNSPF's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as KWIPF (93). This means that LNSPF’s stock grew similarly to KWIPF’s over the last 12 months.

LNSPF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as KWIPF (48). This means that LNSPF’s stock grew similarly to KWIPF’s over the last 12 months.

KWIPF's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LNSPF (91). This means that KWIPF’s stock grew significantly faster than LNSPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KWIPFLNSPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
32%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
46%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
49%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
43%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
33%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
35%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KWIPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LNSPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RSEGX54.640.77
+1.43%
Victory RS Small Cap Growth A
JLGMX89.410.94
+1.06%
JPMorgan Large Cap Growth R6
FVADX61.780.53
+0.87%
Franklin Small Cap Value Adv
ACSMX11.450.09
+0.79%
Advisors Capital Small/Mid Cap
EIVPX16.060.04
+0.25%
Parametric Volatil Risk Prm-Defensv I

KWIPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KWIPF and MDRR have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KWIPF and MDRR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KWIPF
1D Price
Change %
KWIPF100%
+16.09%
MDRR - KWIPF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.10%
BTBIF - KWIPF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LNSPF - KWIPF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KREVF - KWIPF
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.15%
MAPGF - KWIPF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

LNSPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LNSPF has been loosely correlated with MAPIF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LNSPF jumps, then MAPIF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LNSPF
1D Price
Change %
LNSPF100%
N/A
MAPIF - LNSPF
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CHTH - LNSPF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BTLCY - LNSPF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.20%
UTGPF - LNSPF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CGIUF - LNSPF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More