KWGHF
Price
$0.18
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
PVLUF
Price
Loading...
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Loading...
Ad is loading...

KWGHF vs PVLUF

Header iconKWGHF vs PVLUF Comparison
Open Charts KWGHF vs PVLUFBanner chart's image
KINGSWOOD
Price$0.18
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$25K
CapitalizationN/A
Partners Value Invts
PriceLoading...
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$750
CapitalizationN/A
KWGHF vs PVLUF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KWGHF vs. PVLUF commentary
Dec 23, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KWGHF is a Hold and PVLUF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 23, 2024
Stock price -- (KWGHF: $0.18 vs. PVLUF: $50.15)
Brand notoriety: KWGHF and PVLUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KWGHF: 100% vs. PVLUF: 100%
Market capitalization -- KWGHF: $55.76M vs. PVLUF: $0
KWGHF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $55.76M. PVLUF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.91B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KWGHF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePVLUF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • KWGHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PVLUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PVLUF is a better buy in the long-term than KWGHF.

Price Growth

KWGHF (@Investment Managers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PVLUF (@Investment Managers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -1.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.03%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-1.85% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PVLUF YTD gains are higher at: 5.623 vs. KWGHF (0.000).
KWGHFPVLUFKWGHF / PVLUF
Capitalization55.8MN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.0005.623-
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue163MN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt3.49MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PVLUF: Fundamental Ratings
PVLUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
34
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
53
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME29.820.82
+2.83%
GameStop Corp
AAPL254.494.70
+1.88%
Apple
SPY591.157.02
+1.20%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X95104.940000-2119.789000
-2.18%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA421.06-15.11
-3.46%
Tesla

KWGHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KWGHF has been loosely correlated with PVLUF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KWGHF jumps, then PVLUF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KWGHF
1D Price
Change %
KWGHF100%
N/A
PVLUF - KWGHF
51%
Loosely correlated
N/A
STJPF - KWGHF
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TSRUF - KWGHF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IGIFF - KWGHF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.19%
PWM - KWGHF
22%
Poorly correlated
-12.78%
More

PVLUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PVLUF has been loosely correlated with KWGHF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PVLUF jumps, then KWGHF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PVLUF
1D Price
Change %
PVLUF100%
N/A
KWGHF - PVLUF
51%
Loosely correlated
N/A
RMCO - PVLUF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.85%
CLSPF - PVLUF
7%
Poorly correlated
+2.82%
TRNLY - PVLUF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LGCP - PVLUF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More