Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KWEB vs PGJ
KWEB vs PGJ Comparison
Open Charts KWEB vs PGJ
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
Price$34.42
Change-$6.92 (-16.74%)
Volume$33.16M
Net Assets8.48B
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF
Price$29.16
Change-$3.66 (-11.15%)
Volume$20.22K
Net Assets135.9M
KWEB vs PGJ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KWEB vs. PGJ commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KWEB is a Hold and PGJ is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KWEB has more net assets: 8.48B vs. PGJ (136M). KWEB has a higher annual dividend yield than PGJ: KWEB (2.996) vs PGJ (2.070). KWEB was incepted earlier than PGJ: KWEB (13 years) vs PGJ (21 years). KWEB (0.70) and PGJ (0.70) have comparable expense ratios . KWEB has a higher turnover PGJ (25.00) vs PGJ (25.00).
| KWEB | PGJ | KWEB / PGJ | |
| Gain YTD | 2.996 | 2.070 | 145% |
| Net Assets | 8.48B | 136M | 6,235% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.70 | 100% |
| Turnover | 54.00 | 25.00 | 216% |
| Yield | 5.86 | 3.29 | 178% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 21 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| KWEB | PGJ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 87% | 7 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
KWEB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KWEB has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KWEB jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KWEB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KWEB | 100% | -0.88% | ||
| BABA - KWEB | 89% Closely correlated | -0.69% | ||
| JD - KWEB | 83% Closely correlated | +0.18% | ||
| BILI - KWEB | 82% Closely correlated | -2.35% | ||
| BIDU - KWEB | 80% Closely correlated | -3.01% | ||
| KC - KWEB | 79% Closely correlated | +3.18% | ||
More | ||||
PGJ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PGJ has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PGJ jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PGJ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PGJ | 100% | -0.69% | ||
| BABA - PGJ | 83% Closely correlated | -0.69% | ||
| JD - PGJ | 81% Closely correlated | +0.18% | ||
| BIDU - PGJ | 79% Closely correlated | -3.01% | ||
| ATHM - PGJ | 72% Closely correlated | -1.77% | ||
| BILI - PGJ | 71% Closely correlated | -2.35% | ||
More | ||||