Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KWEB vs MCHS
KWEB vs MCHS Comparison
Open Charts KWEB vs MCHS
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
Price$34.48
Change+$0.14 (+0.41%)
Volume$12.58M
Net Assets6.44B
Matthews China Discovery Active ETF
Price$28.61
Change-$0.08 (-0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.3M
KWEB vs MCHS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KWEB vs. MCHS commentary
Jun 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KWEB is a Hold and MCHS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KWEB has more net assets: 6.44B vs. MCHS (2.3M). KWEB has a higher annual dividend yield than MCHS: KWEB (17.921) vs MCHS (12.640). KWEB was incepted earlier than MCHS: KWEB (12 years) vs MCHS (1 year). KWEB (0.70) has a lower expense ratio than MCHS (0.89). MCHS has a higher turnover KWEB (32.00) vs KWEB (32.00).
| KWEB | MCHS | KWEB / MCHS | |
| Gain YTD | 17.921 | 12.640 | 142% |
| Net Assets | 6.44B | 2.3M | 279,713% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.89 | 79% |
| Turnover | 32.00 | 115.31 | 28% |
| Yield | 3.09 | 5.06 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 1 year | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| KWEB | MCHS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
KWEB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KWEB has been closely correlated with WB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KWEB jumps, then WB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KWEB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KWEB | 100% | +0.41% | ||
| WB - KWEB | 83% Closely correlated | +0.52% | ||
| BEKE - KWEB | 77% Closely correlated | +0.54% | ||
| BZ - KWEB | 76% Closely correlated | +2.84% | ||
| YMM - KWEB | 73% Closely correlated | -2.15% | ||
| IQ - KWEB | 72% Closely correlated | -0.56% | ||
More | ||||
MCHS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCHS has been loosely correlated with BZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCHS jumps, then BZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCHS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCHS | 100% | N/A | ||
| BZ - MCHS | 54% Loosely correlated | +2.84% | ||
| YMM - MCHS | 50% Loosely correlated | -2.15% | ||
| ACMR - MCHS | 46% Loosely correlated | -2.75% | ||
| ATAT - MCHS | 38% Loosely correlated | +0.99% | ||
| ZH - MCHS | 37% Loosely correlated | N/A |