Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KWEB vs MCH
KWEB vs MCH Comparison
Open Charts KWEB vs MCH
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
Price$39.49
Change-$0.04 (-0.10%)
Volume$37.74M
Net Assets9.12B
Matthews China Active ETF
Price$28.94
Change-$0.24 (-0.82%)
Volume$4.6K
Net Assets22.82M
KWEB vs MCH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KWEB vs. MCH commentary
Oct 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KWEB is a Hold and MCH is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KWEB has more net assets: 9.12B vs. MCH (22.8M). KWEB has a higher annual dividend yield than MCH: KWEB (35.055) vs MCH (31.259). KWEB was incepted earlier than MCH: KWEB (12 years) vs MCH (3 years). KWEB (0.70) has a lower expense ratio than MCH (0.79). MCH (55.22) and KWEB (54.00) have matching turnover.
| KWEB | MCH | KWEB / MCH | |
| Gain YTD | 35.055 | 31.259 | 112% |
| Net Assets | 9.12B | 22.8M | 39,991% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.79 | 89% |
| Turnover | 54.00 | 55.22 | 98% |
| Yield | 2.42 | 0.95 | 255% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| KWEB | MCH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 10 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
KWEB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KWEB has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KWEB jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KWEB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KWEB | 100% | -0.10% | ||
| BABA - KWEB | 89% Closely correlated | +1.19% | ||
| JD - KWEB | 83% Closely correlated | +1.01% | ||
| BILI - KWEB | 82% Closely correlated | -0.88% | ||
| BIDU - KWEB | 80% Closely correlated | -0.73% | ||
| KC - KWEB | 79% Closely correlated | -4.40% | ||
More | ||||
MCH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCH has been loosely correlated with LKNCY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCH jumps, then LKNCY could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCH | 100% | -0.82% | ||
| LKNCY - MCH | 47% Loosely correlated | +1.52% | ||
| DIDIY - MCH | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.16% | ||
| BILI - MCH | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.88% | ||
| HTHT - MCH | 22% Poorly correlated | +1.61% | ||
| PDD - MCH | 11% Poorly correlated | +0.89% | ||
More | ||||