Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KWEB vs MCH
KWEB vs MCH Comparison
Open Charts KWEB vs MCH
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
Price$34.83
Change+$0.32 (+0.93%)
Volume$6.79M
Net Assets8.03B
Matthews China Active ETF
Price$28.86
Change+$0.26 (+0.91%)
Volume$4.42K
Net Assets23M
KWEB vs MCH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KWEB vs. MCH commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KWEB is a Hold and MCH is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KWEB has more net assets: 8.03B vs. MCH (23M). MCH has a higher annual dividend yield than KWEB: MCH (30.884) vs KWEB (19.118). KWEB was incepted earlier than MCH: KWEB (12 years) vs MCH (3 years). KWEB (0.70) has a lower expense ratio than MCH (0.79). MCH (55.22) and KWEB (54.00) have matching turnover.
| KWEB | MCH | KWEB / MCH | |
| Gain YTD | 19.118 | 30.884 | 62% |
| Net Assets | 8.03B | 23M | 34,900% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.79 | 89% |
| Turnover | 54.00 | 55.22 | 98% |
| Yield | 2.74 | 1.01 | 273% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| KWEB | MCH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 87% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 88% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 11 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
KWEB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KWEB has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KWEB jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KWEB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KWEB | 100% | +0.93% | ||
| BABA - KWEB | 89% Closely correlated | +1.45% | ||
| JD - KWEB | 83% Closely correlated | +0.79% | ||
| BILI - KWEB | 82% Closely correlated | +0.73% | ||
| BIDU - KWEB | 80% Closely correlated | +1.17% | ||
| KC - KWEB | 79% Closely correlated | +0.56% | ||
More | ||||
MCH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCH has been loosely correlated with LKNCY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCH jumps, then LKNCY could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCH | 100% | +0.89% | ||
| LKNCY - MCH | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.09% | ||
| DIDIY - MCH | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.18% | ||
| BILI - MCH | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.73% | ||
| HTHT - MCH | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.27% | ||
| PDD - MCH | 11% Poorly correlated | +1.38% | ||
More | ||||