Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KWEB vs MCH
KWEB vs MCH Comparison
Open Charts KWEB vs MCH
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
Price$38.44
Change+$0.50 (+1.32%)
Volume$18.13M
Net Assets8.55B
Matthews China Active ETF
Price$28.25
Change+$0.67 (+2.43%)
Volume$281
Net Assets23.33M
KWEB vs MCH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KWEB vs. MCH commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KWEB is a Buy and MCH is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KWEB has more net assets: 8.55B vs. MCH (23.3M). KWEB has a higher annual dividend yield than MCH: KWEB (31.464) vs MCH (28.137). KWEB was incepted earlier than MCH: KWEB (12 years) vs MCH (3 years). KWEB (0.70) has a lower expense ratio than MCH (0.79). MCH (55.22) and KWEB (54.00) have matching turnover.
| KWEB | MCH | KWEB / MCH | |
| Gain YTD | 31.464 | 28.137 | 112% |
| Net Assets | 8.55B | 23.3M | 36,700% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.79 | 89% |
| Turnover | 54.00 | 55.22 | 98% |
| Yield | 2.74 | 1.03 | 265% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| KWEB | MCH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 88% | 6 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 28 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
KWEB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KWEB has been closely correlated with BZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KWEB jumps, then BZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KWEB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KWEB | 100% | +1.32% | ||
| BZ - KWEB | 78% Closely correlated | -0.12% | ||
| WB - KWEB | 75% Closely correlated | +1.47% | ||
| PDD - KWEB | 75% Closely correlated | +0.65% | ||
| BEKE - KWEB | 75% Closely correlated | +2.32% | ||
| ATHM - KWEB | 72% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
MCH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MCH and DIDIY have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MCH and DIDIY's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCH | 100% | +2.46% | ||
| DIDIY - MCH | 30% Poorly correlated | +4.00% | ||
| LKNCY - MCH | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.46% | ||
| PDD - MCH | 14% Poorly correlated | +0.65% | ||
| TCOM - MCH | 12% Poorly correlated | -0.27% | ||
| YUMC - MCH | 8% Poorly correlated | +0.51% | ||
More | ||||