KUYAF
Price
$0.18
Change
-$0.01 (-5.26%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
NCAUF
Price
$0.22
Change
-$0.02 (-8.33%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
Ad is loading...

KUYAF vs NCAUF

Header iconKUYAF vs NCAUF Comparison
Open Charts KUYAF vs NCAUFBanner chart's image
Kuya Silver
Price$0.18
Change-$0.01 (-5.26%)
Volume$54.4K
CapitalizationN/A
Newcore Gold
Price$0.22
Change-$0.02 (-8.33%)
Volume$29.9K
CapitalizationN/A
KUYAF vs NCAUF Comparison Chart
Loading...
KUYAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KUYAF vs. NCAUF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KUYAF is a Hold and NCAUF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (KUYAF: $0.18 vs. NCAUF: $0.22)
Brand notoriety: KUYAF and NCAUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KUYAF: 44% vs. NCAUF: 33%
Market capitalization -- KUYAF: $25.24M vs. NCAUF: $18.78M
KUYAF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $25.24M. NCAUF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $18.78M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KUYAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNCAUF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • KUYAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NCAUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, NCAUF is a better buy in the long-term than KUYAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KUYAF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • KUYAF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

KUYAF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -16.74% price change this week, while NCAUF (@Precious Metals) price change was +0.81% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -3.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.54%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-3.68% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KUYAF($25.2M) has a higher market cap than NCAUF($18.8M). NCAUF YTD gains are higher at: 111.629 vs. KUYAF (-4.566). NCAUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.4M vs. KUYAF (-5.26M). NCAUF has more cash in the bank: 2.27M vs. KUYAF (477K). KUYAF (0) and NCAUF (0) have equivalent revenues.
KUYAFNCAUFKUYAF / NCAUF
Capitalization25.2M18.8M134%
EBITDA-5.26M-2.4M219%
Gain YTD-4.566111.629-4%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash477K2.27M21%
Total Debt158KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KUYAF vs NCAUF: Fundamental Ratings
KUYAF
NCAUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
258
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
38
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9182
SMR RATING
1..100
9692
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6540
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
49n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KUYAF's Valuation (33) in the null industry is in the same range as NCAUF (38). This means that KUYAF’s stock grew similarly to NCAUF’s over the last 12 months.

NCAUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (82) in the null industry is in the same range as KUYAF (91). This means that NCAUF’s stock grew similarly to KUYAF’s over the last 12 months.

NCAUF's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as KUYAF (96). This means that NCAUF’s stock grew similarly to KUYAF’s over the last 12 months.

NCAUF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as KUYAF (65). This means that NCAUF’s stock grew similarly to KUYAF’s over the last 12 months.

NCAUF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as KUYAF (100). This means that NCAUF’s stock grew similarly to KUYAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KUYAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
KUYAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME31.261.82
+6.18%
GameStop Corp
TSLA479.8616.84
+3.64%
Tesla
AAPL253.482.44
+0.97%
Apple
BTC.X106140.600000110.890625
+0.10%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY604.29-2.50
-0.41%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust

KUYAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KUYAF has been loosely correlated with OCGSF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KUYAF jumps, then OCGSF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KUYAF
1D Price
Change %
KUYAF100%
-4.80%
OCGSF - KUYAF
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.84%
ISVLF - KUYAF
36%
Loosely correlated
-3.12%
DOLLF - KUYAF
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.66%
GPTRF - KUYAF
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IRVRF - KUYAF
32%
Poorly correlated
-3.11%
More

NCAUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NCAUF and BLTMF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NCAUF and BLTMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NCAUF
1D Price
Change %
NCAUF100%
-7.94%
BLTMF - NCAUF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KUYAF - NCAUF
26%
Poorly correlated
-4.80%
HSTXF - NCAUF
25%
Poorly correlated
-3.23%
CGLCF - NCAUF
23%
Poorly correlated
-3.57%
HMY - NCAUF
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.14%
More