KUYAF
Price
$0.18
Change
+$0.01 (+5.88%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
25.24M
MMNGF
Price
$0.11
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
44.02M
Ad is loading...

KUYAF vs MMNGF

Header iconKUYAF vs MMNGF Comparison
Open Charts KUYAF vs MMNGFBanner chart's image
Kuya Silver
Price$0.18
Change+$0.01 (+5.88%)
Volume$91.66K
Capitalization25.24M
Metallic Minerals
Price$0.11
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$60.5K
Capitalization44.02M
KUYAF vs MMNGF Comparison Chart
Loading...
KUYAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MMNGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KUYAF vs. MMNGF commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KUYAF is a Hold and MMNGF is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (KUYAF: $0.18 vs. MMNGF: $0.11)
Brand notoriety: KUYAF and MMNGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KUYAF: 98% vs. MMNGF: 25%
Market capitalization -- KUYAF: $25.24M vs. MMNGF: $44.02M
KUYAF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $25.24M. MMNGF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $44.02M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KUYAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMMNGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • KUYAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MMNGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, KUYAF is a better buy in the long-term than MMNGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KUYAF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MMNGF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KUYAF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MMNGF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KUYAF is a better buy in the short-term than MMNGF.

Price Growth

KUYAF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +2.86% price change this week, while MMNGF (@Precious Metals) price change was +9.06% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +2.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.38%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+2.38% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MMNGF($44M) has a higher market cap than KUYAF($25.2M). MMNGF YTD gains are higher at: 11.732 vs. KUYAF (2.215). KUYAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -5.26M vs. MMNGF (-6.19M). KUYAF has more cash in the bank: 477K vs. MMNGF (216K). MMNGF has less debt than KUYAF: MMNGF (15K) vs KUYAF (158K). KUYAF (0) and MMNGF (0) have equivalent revenues.
KUYAFMMNGFKUYAF / MMNGF
Capitalization25.2M44M57%
EBITDA-5.26M-6.19M85%
Gain YTD2.21511.73219%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash477K216K221%
Total Debt158K15K1,053%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KUYAF vs MMNGF: Fundamental Ratings
KUYAF
MMNGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5222
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
90100
SMR RATING
1..100
9598
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8763
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KUYAF's Valuation (33) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MMNGF (96). This means that KUYAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MMNGF’s over the last 12 months.

KUYAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as MMNGF (100). This means that KUYAF’s stock grew similarly to MMNGF’s over the last 12 months.

KUYAF's SMR Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as MMNGF (98). This means that KUYAF’s stock grew similarly to MMNGF’s over the last 12 months.

MMNGF's Price Growth Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as KUYAF (87). This means that MMNGF’s stock grew similarly to KUYAF’s over the last 12 months.

MMNGF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as KUYAF (100). This means that MMNGF’s stock grew similarly to KUYAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KUYAFMMNGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
87%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
81%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
KUYAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MMNGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSLA426.5012.68
+3.06%
Tesla
SPY597.585.94
+1.00%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL229.981.72
+0.75%
Apple
BTC.X104408.070000-53.968750
-0.05%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME27.51-0.21
-0.76%
GameStop Corp

KUYAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KUYAF has been loosely correlated with OCGSF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KUYAF jumps, then OCGSF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KUYAF
1D Price
Change %
KUYAF100%
+5.88%
OCGSF - KUYAF
38%
Loosely correlated
+1.26%
ISVLF - KUYAF
36%
Loosely correlated
+5.05%
DOLLF - KUYAF
35%
Loosely correlated
+1.55%
GPTRF - KUYAF
33%
Poorly correlated
-3.99%
IRVRF - KUYAF
32%
Poorly correlated
+8.23%
More

MMNGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MMNGF and OCGSF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MMNGF and OCGSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MMNGF
1D Price
Change %
MMNGF100%
+2.53%
OCGSF - MMNGF
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.26%
TORXF - MMNGF
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.04%
ANPMF - MMNGF
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.09%
CHPGF - MMNGF
26%
Poorly correlated
-3.13%
KUYAF - MMNGF
26%
Poorly correlated
+5.88%
More