Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KURE vs KWEB
KURE vs KWEB Comparison
Open Charts KURE vs KWEB
KraneShares MSCI All China Hlth Care ETF
Price$17.66
Change+$0.18 (+1.03%)
Volume$572
Net Assets79.16M
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
Price$33.31
Change-$1.11 (-3.22%)
Volume$18.83K
Net Assets8.48B
KURE vs KWEB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KURE vs. KWEB commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KURE is a Hold and KWEB is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KWEB has more net assets: 8.48B vs. KURE (79.2M). KURE has a higher annual dividend yield than KWEB: KURE (2.582) vs KWEB (1.087). KURE was incepted earlier than KWEB: KURE (8 years) vs KWEB (13 years). KURE (0.65) has a lower expense ratio than KWEB (0.70). KURE has a higher turnover KWEB (54.00) vs KWEB (54.00).
| KURE | KWEB | KURE / KWEB | |
| Gain YTD | 2.582 | 1.087 | 238% |
| Net Assets | 79.2M | 8.48B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.70 | 93% |
| Turnover | 77.00 | 54.00 | 143% |
| Yield | 4.01 | 5.86 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 13 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| KURE | KWEB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 23 days ago 79% | 7 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
KURE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that KURE and LEGN have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KURE and LEGN's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KURE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KURE | 100% | +0.40% | ||
| LEGN - KURE | 17% Poorly correlated | -2.86% | ||
| BNR - KURE | 2% Poorly correlated | -15.00% | ||
| NBP - KURE | -0% Poorly correlated | +1.46% | ||
| HCM - KURE | -2% Poorly correlated | -1.17% | ||
| ONC - KURE | -2% Poorly correlated | +0.40% | ||
More | ||||
KWEB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KWEB has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KWEB jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KWEB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KWEB | 100% | -1.85% | ||
| BABA - KWEB | 89% Closely correlated | -2.81% | ||
| JD - KWEB | 83% Closely correlated | -1.72% | ||
| BILI - KWEB | 82% Closely correlated | -4.21% | ||
| BIDU - KWEB | 80% Closely correlated | -2.50% | ||
| KC - KWEB | 79% Closely correlated | -3.67% | ||
More | ||||