Advertisement
KUBR vs LOCL
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KUBR is a Hold and LOCL is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
KUBR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLOCL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- KUBR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- LOCL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
KUBR’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LOCL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- KUBR’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
- LOCL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
KUBR (@Office Equipment/Supplies) experienced а +0.65% price change this week, while LOCL (@Agricultural Commodities/Milling) price change was -14.32% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Office Equipment/Supplies industry was -0.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.13%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry was +1.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.49%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Office Equipment/Supplies (-0.63% weekly)The industry produces equipment regularly used in offices by businesses and other organizations, and could range from items like Blank sheet paper, calendars, Label and adhesive paper, paper clips, janitorial supplies, to larger /higher cost products like computers, printers, photocopiers, office furniture and so on. Many businesses in the office supply industry have been expanding into related markets like business cards, plus printing and binding of high quality, high volume business and engineering documents. Some companies in this industry also offer shipping services, including packaging and bulk mailing. Herman Miller, Inc., Steelcase Inc. and HNI Corporation.
@Agricultural Commodities/Milling (+1.54% weekly)The Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry includes companies that are involved in farming activities, such as crop production, livestock management and animal feed, for commercial purposes. The industry includes a wide range of operations from growing corn, to grain and oilseed processing to the operation of flour mills. Changes in consumer tastes is one of the critical factors influencing what products are grown and raised in this industry. Potential risks to the business include climate change and fluctuations in global prices of agricultural products. Archer-Daniels-Midland Company, Elanco Animal Health, Inc., Bunge Limited and Canopy Growth Corporation are some of the biggest U.S. companies operating in this industry.
| KUBR | LOCL | KUBR / LOCL | |
| Capitalization | 977M | 64.8M | 1,508% |
| EBITDA | 3.67M | -46.09M | -8% |
| Gain YTD | 37.778 | 41.560 | 91% |
| P/E Ratio | 402.60 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 5.99M | 44M | 14% |
| Total Cash | 67.3K | 5.29M | 1% |
| Total Debt | 220K | 479M | 0% |
KUBR | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 99 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 51 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 76 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| KUBR | LOCL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 56% | 3 days ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 29% | 3 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 24% | 3 days ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 21 days ago 67% | 12 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 41% | 3 days ago 88% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GMCFX | 32.13 | 0.36 | +1.13% |
| GMO International Equity IV | |||
| BRUKX | 17.06 | 0.17 | +1.01% |
| MFS Blended Research Value Equity R2 | |||
| JSMVX | 18.20 | 0.17 | +0.94% |
| Jackson Square SMID-Cap Growth Inv | |||
| HDGVX | 37.77 | 0.24 | +0.65% |
| Hartford Dividend and Growth R6 | |||
| QAACX | 52.28 | 0.31 | +0.60% |
| Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core A | |||
KUBR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that KUBR and EDBL have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KUBR and EDBL's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KUBR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KUBR | 100% | +0.32% | ||
| EDBL - KUBR | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| DTCK - KUBR | 3% Poorly correlated | +2.80% | ||
| LOCL - KUBR | 1% Poorly correlated | -4.24% | ||
| UPBMF - KUBR | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| AFRI - KUBR | -0% Poorly correlated | +2.77% |
LOCL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that LOCL and SARDY have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LOCL and SARDY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LOCL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LOCL | 100% | -4.24% | ||
| SARDY - LOCL | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CHSCN - LOCL | 9% Poorly correlated | -0.12% | ||
| AQB - LOCL | 7% Poorly correlated | +11.52% | ||
| VITL - LOCL | 7% Poorly correlated | +3.52% | ||
| DTCK - LOCL | 4% Poorly correlated | +2.80% | ||
More | ||||