KTH
Price
$28.65
Change
+$0.15 (+0.53%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
SEIC
Price
$89.99
Change
+$0.20 (+0.22%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
9.3B
87 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

KTH vs SEIC

Header iconKTH vs SEIC Comparison
Open Charts KTH vs SEICBanner chart's image
Structured Products CorTS PECO Energy Cap Trust III
Price$28.65
Change+$0.15 (+0.53%)
Volume$399
CapitalizationN/A
SEI Investments
Price$89.99
Change+$0.20 (+0.22%)
Volume$1.21M
Capitalization9.3B
KTH vs SEIC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
KTH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SEIC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KTH vs. SEIC commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KTH is a StrongBuy and SEIC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (KTH: $28.65 vs. SEIC: $89.99)
Brand notoriety: KTH and SEIC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KTH: 45% vs. SEIC: 103%
Market capitalization -- KTH: $0 vs. SEIC: $9.3B
KTH [@Investment Managers] is valued at $0. SEIC’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $9.3B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KTH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSEIC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • KTH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SEIC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SEIC is a better buy in the long-term than KTH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KTH’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SEIC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KTH’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SEIC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KTH is a better buy in the short-term than SEIC.

Price Growth

KTH (@Investment Managers) experienced а -0.24% price change this week, while SEIC (@Investment Managers) price change was -3.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.52%.

Reported Earning Dates

SEIC is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.61% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SEIC YTD gains are higher at: 9.733 vs. KTH (-1.513).
KTHSEICKTH / SEIC
CapitalizationN/A9.3B-
EBITDAN/A669M-
Gain YTD-1.5139.733-16%
P/E RatioN/A20.47-
RevenueN/A1.92B-
Total CashN/A866M-
Total DebtN/A25.4M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KTH vs SEIC: Fundamental Ratings
KTH
SEIC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4085
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
85
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10019
SMR RATING
1..100
10036
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5947
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10057
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
19n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KTH's Valuation (26) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SEIC (85) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that KTH’s stock grew somewhat faster than SEIC’s over the last 12 months.

SEIC's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the Investment Managers industry is significantly better than the same rating for KTH (100) in the null industry. This means that SEIC’s stock grew significantly faster than KTH’s over the last 12 months.

SEIC's SMR Rating (36) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KTH (100) in the null industry. This means that SEIC’s stock grew somewhat faster than KTH’s over the last 12 months.

SEIC's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as KTH (59) in the null industry. This means that SEIC’s stock grew similarly to KTH’s over the last 12 months.

SEIC's P/E Growth Rating (57) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KTH (100) in the null industry. This means that SEIC’s stock grew somewhat faster than KTH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KTHSEIC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
34%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
14%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
21%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
13%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
15%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
13%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
50%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
9%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
8%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
14%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KTH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SEIC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BHFAN13.400.76
+6.01%
Brighthouse Financial
MTN160.562.97
+1.88%
Vail Resorts
CODI6.830.10
+1.49%
Compass Diversified
LSBK12.150.05
+0.41%
Lake Shore Bancorp Inc
CVEO24.07-0.50
-2.04%
Civeo Corp

KTH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KTH and SII have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KTH and SII's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KTH
1D Price
Change %
KTH100%
+0.53%
SII - KTH
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.27%
NOAH - KTH
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.16%
SCM - KTH
-1%
Poorly correlated
+0.68%
SEIC - KTH
-1%
Poorly correlated
+0.22%
WHG - KTH
-1%
Poorly correlated
+0.22%
More

SEIC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SEIC has been closely correlated with TROW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SEIC jumps, then TROW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SEIC
1D Price
Change %
SEIC100%
+0.22%
TROW - SEIC
79%
Closely correlated
-0.59%
JHG - SEIC
76%
Closely correlated
+0.19%
BN - SEIC
76%
Closely correlated
+0.22%
AMG - SEIC
74%
Closely correlated
+2.18%
BX - SEIC
73%
Closely correlated
-0.01%
More