KTGDF
Price
$0.60
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
114.31M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PAAS
Price
$53.83
Change
-$0.01 (-0.02%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
22.63B
61 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

KTGDF vs PAAS

Header iconKTGDF vs PAAS Comparison
Open Charts KTGDF vs PAASBanner chart's image
K2 Gold
Price$0.60
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$31.26K
Capitalization114.31M
Pan American Silver
Price$53.83
Change-$0.01 (-0.02%)
Volume$2.27M
Capitalization22.63B
KTGDF vs PAAS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KTGDF vs. PAAS commentary
Dec 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KTGDF is a Buy and PAAS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 26, 2025
Stock price -- (KTGDF: $0.60 vs. PAAS: $53.83)
Brand notoriety: KTGDF: Not notable vs. PAAS: Notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KTGDF: 102% vs. PAAS: 37%
Market capitalization -- KTGDF: $114.31M vs. PAAS: $22.63B
KTGDF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $114.31M. PAAS’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $22.63B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $121.74B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $4B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KTGDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePAAS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • KTGDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PAAS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PAAS is a better buy in the long-term than KTGDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KTGDF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAAS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KTGDF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PAAS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KTGDF is a better buy in the short-term than PAAS.

Price Growth

KTGDF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +14.83% price change this week, while PAAS (@Precious Metals) price change was +7.66% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +10.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +21.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +85.45%.

Reported Earning Dates

PAAS is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+10.72% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAAS($22.6B) has a higher market cap than KTGDF($114M). KTGDF YTD gains are higher at: 593.642 vs. PAAS (169.521). PAAS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.52B vs. KTGDF (-1.75M). PAAS has more cash in the bank: 911M vs. KTGDF (9.72M). KTGDF has less debt than PAAS: KTGDF (22K) vs PAAS (857M). PAAS has higher revenues than KTGDF: PAAS (3.26B) vs KTGDF (0).
KTGDFPAASKTGDF / PAAS
Capitalization114M22.6B1%
EBITDA-1.75M1.52B-0%
Gain YTD593.642169.521350%
P/E RatioN/A31.12-
Revenue03.26B-
Total Cash9.72M911M1%
Total Debt22K857M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KTGDF vs PAAS: Fundamental Ratings
KTGDF
PAAS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5045
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6939
SMR RATING
1..100
9366
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3436
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10097
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9033

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PAAS's Valuation (19) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as KTGDF (50) in the null industry. This means that PAAS’s stock grew similarly to KTGDF’s over the last 12 months.

PAAS's Profit vs Risk Rating (39) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as KTGDF (69) in the null industry. This means that PAAS’s stock grew similarly to KTGDF’s over the last 12 months.

PAAS's SMR Rating (66) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as KTGDF (93) in the null industry. This means that PAAS’s stock grew similarly to KTGDF’s over the last 12 months.

KTGDF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as PAAS (36) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that KTGDF’s stock grew similarly to PAAS’s over the last 12 months.

PAAS's P/E Growth Rating (97) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as KTGDF (100) in the null industry. This means that PAAS’s stock grew similarly to KTGDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KTGDFPAAS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KTGDF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PAAS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ACIO44.220.17
+0.39%
Aptus Collared Investment Opp ETF
EDD5.530.02
+0.36%
Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Debt Fund
HERD45.010.09
+0.21%
Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF
SIXG64.88-0.21
-0.32%
Defiance Connective Technologies ETF
BETE45.63-3.98
-8.02%
ProShares Bitcoin & Eth Eq Wgh ETF

KTGDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KTGDF and CRNLF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KTGDF and CRNLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KTGDF
1D Price
Change %
KTGDF100%
+0.76%
CRNLF - KTGDF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PAAS - KTGDF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.02%
STLRF - KTGDF
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.14%
VGZ - KTGDF
23%
Poorly correlated
-4.13%
CMCL - KTGDF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.29%
More

PAAS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAAS has been closely correlated with WPM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAAS jumps, then WPM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PAAS
1D Price
Change %
PAAS100%
-0.02%
WPM - PAAS
80%
Closely correlated
-0.75%
AEM - PAAS
79%
Closely correlated
+0.04%
CGAU - PAAS
77%
Closely correlated
-0.80%
KGC - PAAS
77%
Closely correlated
-0.61%
AGI - PAAS
77%
Closely correlated
-0.74%
More