KTGDF
Price
$0.50
Change
-$0.02 (-3.85%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
94.23M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
LMEFF
Price
$0.20
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
56.9M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

KTGDF vs LMEFF

Header iconKTGDF vs LMEFF Comparison
Open Charts KTGDF vs LMEFFBanner chart's image
K2 Gold
Price$0.50
Change-$0.02 (-3.85%)
Volume$31.69K
Capitalization94.23M
Laurion Mineral Exploration
Price$0.20
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$10.1K
Capitalization56.9M
KTGDF vs LMEFF Comparison Chart in %
KTGDF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
LMEFF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KTGDF vs. LMEFF commentary
Dec 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KTGDF is a Buy and LMEFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 05, 2025
Stock price -- (KTGDF: $0.50 vs. LMEFF: $0.20)
Brand notoriety: KTGDF and LMEFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KTGDF: 95% vs. LMEFF: 44%
Market capitalization -- KTGDF: $94.23M vs. LMEFF: $56.9M
KTGDF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $94.23M. LMEFF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $56.9M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $112.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.53B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KTGDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLMEFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • KTGDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LMEFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, KTGDF is a better buy in the long-term than LMEFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KTGDF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LMEFF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KTGDF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LMEFF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KTGDF is a better buy in the short-term than LMEFF.

Price Growth

KTGDF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +38.89% price change this week, while LMEFF (@Precious Metals) price change was +2.89% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +5.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +16.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +63.31%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+5.15% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KTGDF($94.2M) has a higher market cap than LMEFF($56.9M). KTGDF YTD gains are higher at: 478.035 vs. LMEFF (-29.896). KTGDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.06M vs. LMEFF (-3.53M). LMEFF has more cash in the bank: 5.72M vs. KTGDF (919K). KTGDF (0) and LMEFF (0) have equivalent revenues.
KTGDFLMEFFKTGDF / LMEFF
Capitalization94.2M56.9M166%
EBITDA-1.06M-3.53M30%
Gain YTD478.035-29.896-1,599%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash919K5.72M16%
Total Debt22KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KTGDF vs LMEFF: Fundamental Ratings
KTGDF
LMEFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3625
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
54
Fair valued
65
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10093
SMR RATING
1..100
9396
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3478
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KTGDF's Valuation (54) in the null industry is in the same range as LMEFF (65). This means that KTGDF’s stock grew similarly to LMEFF’s over the last 12 months.

LMEFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as KTGDF (100). This means that LMEFF’s stock grew similarly to KTGDF’s over the last 12 months.

KTGDF's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as LMEFF (96). This means that KTGDF’s stock grew similarly to LMEFF’s over the last 12 months.

KTGDF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LMEFF (78). This means that KTGDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LMEFF’s over the last 12 months.

KTGDF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as LMEFF (100). This means that KTGDF’s stock grew similarly to LMEFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KTGDFLMEFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KTGDF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
LMEFF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HBSI45.003.49
+8.41%
Highlands Bankshares, Inc.
AMKYF20.85N/A
N/A
Abc Mart, Inc.
DMCOF5.86N/A
N/A
d'Amico International Shipping SA
PDRDF88.95-0.69
-0.78%
Pernod Ricard S.A.
ORLCF0.03N/A
-3.79%
ORACLE COMMODITY HLDG CORP

KTGDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KTGDF and CRNLF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KTGDF and CRNLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KTGDF
1D Price
Change %
KTGDF100%
-4.03%
CRNLF - KTGDF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PAAS - KTGDF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.91%
STLRF - KTGDF
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.45%
VGZ - KTGDF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.53%
CMCL - KTGDF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.89%
More

LMEFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LMEFF and KSSRF have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LMEFF and KSSRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LMEFF
1D Price
Change %
LMEFF100%
+1.22%
KSSRF - LMEFF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LGDTF - LMEFF
1%
Poorly correlated
-1.61%
KSKGF - LMEFF
-2%
Poorly correlated
+15.17%
KTGDF - LMEFF
-2%
Poorly correlated
-4.03%
KOREF - LMEFF
-6%
Poorly correlated
-8.45%