Advertisement
KT vs SFTBY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KT is a Hold and SFTBY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
KT’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSFTBY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- KT’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- SFTBY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
KT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SFTBY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- KT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- SFTBY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
KT (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а -1.85% price change this week, while SFTBY (@Major Telecommunications) price change was -7.42% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was +0.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.33%.
Reported Earning Dates
KT is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.
SFTBY is expected to report earnings on Feb 10, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Major Telecommunications (+0.34% weekly)Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.
| KT | SFTBY | KT / SFTBY | |
| Capitalization | 8.18B | 203B | 4% |
| EBITDA | 5.48T | 3.83T | 143% |
| Gain YTD | 17.376 | 144.969 | 12% |
| P/E Ratio | 14.02 | 10.17 | 138% |
| Revenue | 27.45T | 7T | 392% |
| Total Cash | 5.02T | 5.44T | 92% |
| Total Debt | 10.75T | 20.33T | 53% |
KT | SFTBY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 73 | 71 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 28 Undervalued | 88 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 13 | 39 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 77 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 35 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 14 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
KT's Valuation (28) in the Major Telecommunications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SFTBY (88) in the null industry. This means that KT’s stock grew somewhat faster than SFTBY’s over the last 12 months.
KT's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the Major Telecommunications industry is in the same range as SFTBY (39) in the null industry. This means that KT’s stock grew similarly to SFTBY’s over the last 12 months.
KT's SMR Rating (77) in the Major Telecommunications industry is in the same range as SFTBY (100) in the null industry. This means that KT’s stock grew similarly to SFTBY’s over the last 12 months.
SFTBY's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as KT (59) in the Major Telecommunications industry. This means that SFTBY’s stock grew similarly to KT’s over the last 12 months.
KT's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Major Telecommunications industry is significantly better than the same rating for SFTBY (100) in the null industry. This means that KT’s stock grew significantly faster than SFTBY’s over the last 12 months.
| KT | SFTBY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 39% | 2 days ago 61% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 33% | 2 days ago 59% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 41% | 2 days ago 68% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 35% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 46% | 7 days ago 67% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 36% | 2 days ago 75% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| EPGFX | 18.94 | 0.66 | +3.61% |
| EuroPac Gold A | |||
| WILCX | 11.17 | 0.03 | +0.27% |
| Wasatch Global Value Institutional | |||
| AMBFX | 39.53 | 0.07 | +0.18% |
| American Funds American Balanced F2 | |||
| BINCX | 24.73 | 0.03 | +0.12% |
| Brandes International Small Cap Equity C | |||
| FOPPX | 63.03 | -0.11 | -0.17% |
| Franklin Growth Opportunities R6 | |||
KT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KT has been loosely correlated with SKM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KT jumps, then SKM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KT | 100% | -1.74% | ||
| SKM - KT | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.29% | ||
| TLGPY - KT | 37% Loosely correlated | +0.70% | ||
| SOBKY - KT | 36% Loosely correlated | -0.21% | ||
| CHT - KT | 36% Loosely correlated | +0.73% | ||
| IDCC - KT | 34% Loosely correlated | -4.57% | ||
More | ||||
SFTBY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SFTBY has been closely correlated with SFTBF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SFTBY jumps, then SFTBF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SFTBY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SFTBY | 100% | -5.87% | ||
| SFTBF - SFTBY | 73% Closely correlated | -3.39% | ||
| TLGPY - SFTBY | 38% Loosely correlated | +0.70% | ||
| KT - SFTBY | 28% Poorly correlated | -1.74% | ||
| RBBN - SFTBY | 28% Poorly correlated | +1.89% | ||
| WOW - SFTBY | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.19% | ||
More | ||||