KSSRF
Price
$0.10
Change
+$0.02 (+28.57%)
Updated
Oct 14 closing price
Capitalization
9.07M
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
STBMF
Price
$0.35
Change
+$0.03 (+9.38%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
487.38M
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

KSSRF vs STBMF

Header iconKSSRF vs STBMF Comparison
Open Charts KSSRF vs STBMFBanner chart's image
Kesselrun Resources
Price$0.10
Change+$0.02 (+28.57%)
Volume$23.1K
Capitalization9.07M
St. Barbara
Price$0.35
Change+$0.03 (+9.38%)
Volume$17K
Capitalization487.38M
KSSRF vs STBMF Comparison Chart in %
KSSRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
STBMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KSSRF vs. STBMF commentary
Oct 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KSSRF is a Hold and STBMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 15, 2025
Stock price -- (KSSRF: $0.09 vs. STBMF: $0.35)
Brand notoriety: KSSRF and STBMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KSSRF: 62% vs. STBMF: 221%
Market capitalization -- KSSRF: $9.07M vs. STBMF: $487.38M
KSSRF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $9.07M. STBMF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $487.38M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $109.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.38B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KSSRF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSTBMF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • KSSRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • STBMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both KSSRF and STBMF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KSSRF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STBMF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KSSRF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • STBMF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KSSRF is a better buy in the short-term than STBMF.

Price Growth

KSSRF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +7.10% price change this week, while STBMF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +5.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +20.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1733.11%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+5.70% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
STBMF($487M) has a higher market cap than KSSRF($9.07M). KSSRF YTD gains are higher at: 280.762 vs. STBMF (236.015).
KSSRFSTBMFKSSRF / STBMF
Capitalization9.07M487M2%
EBITDA-606.73KN/A-
Gain YTD280.762236.015119%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue0N/A-
Total Cash582KN/A-
Total Debt145KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KSSRF vs STBMF: Fundamental Ratings
KSSRF
STBMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3946
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
7
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9395
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3436
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
396
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

STBMF's Valuation (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for KSSRF (92). This means that STBMF’s stock grew significantly faster than KSSRF’s over the last 12 months.

STBMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as KSSRF (100). This means that STBMF’s stock grew similarly to KSSRF’s over the last 12 months.

KSSRF's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as STBMF (95). This means that KSSRF’s stock grew similarly to STBMF’s over the last 12 months.

KSSRF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as STBMF (36). This means that KSSRF’s stock grew similarly to STBMF’s over the last 12 months.

KSSRF's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for STBMF (96). This means that KSSRF’s stock grew significantly faster than STBMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KSSRFSTBMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
81%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
66%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KSSRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
STBMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CYRBY5.311.27
+31.44%
Cyrela Brazil Realty S.A.
SMDZF0.210.02
+12.81%
Strategic Metals Ltd. New
JDSEF0.30N/A
N/A
JADESTONE ENERGY PLC
AFSIA14.01-0.09
-0.64%
AmTrust Financial Services, Inc.
NCLTF15.53-0.50
-3.09%
Nitori Holdings Co., Ltd.

KSSRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KSSRF and STBMF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KSSRF and STBMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KSSRF
1D Price
Change %
KSSRF100%
+28.38%
STBMF - KSSRF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PMDRF - KSSRF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GSISF - KSSRF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BYAGF - KSSRF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.08%
WKGFF - KSSRF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

STBMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that STBMF and KSSRF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that STBMF and KSSRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STBMF
1D Price
Change %
STBMF100%
N/A
KSSRF - STBMF
27%
Poorly correlated
+28.38%
ELRRF - STBMF
26%
Poorly correlated
-3.40%
PREIF - STBMF
20%
Poorly correlated
-4.44%
STPGF - STBMF
12%
Poorly correlated
-3.38%
STRRF - STBMF
2%
Poorly correlated
+20.30%
More