KSSRF
Price
$0.07
Change
-$0.02 (-22.22%)
Updated
Nov 21 closing price
Capitalization
8.4M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
LMEFF
Price
$0.22
Change
+$0.02 (+10.00%)
Updated
Dec 23 closing price
Capitalization
57.08M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

KSSRF vs LMEFF

Header iconKSSRF vs LMEFF Comparison
Open Charts KSSRF vs LMEFFBanner chart's image
Kesselrun Resources
Price$0.07
Change-$0.02 (-22.22%)
Volume$122.5K
Capitalization8.4M
Laurion Mineral Exploration
Price$0.22
Change+$0.02 (+10.00%)
Volume$186
Capitalization57.08M
KSSRF vs LMEFF Comparison Chart in %
KSSRF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
LMEFF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KSSRF vs. LMEFF commentary
Dec 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KSSRF is a StrongBuy and LMEFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 26, 2025
Stock price -- (KSSRF: $0.07 vs. LMEFF: $0.22)
Brand notoriety: KSSRF and LMEFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KSSRF: 146% vs. LMEFF: 1%
Market capitalization -- KSSRF: $8.4M vs. LMEFF: $57.08M
KSSRF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $8.4M. LMEFF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $57.08M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $121.74B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $4B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KSSRF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLMEFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • KSSRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LMEFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, KSSRF is a better buy in the long-term than LMEFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KSSRF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LMEFF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KSSRF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • LMEFF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LMEFF is a better buy in the short-term than KSSRF.

Price Growth

KSSRF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while LMEFF (@Precious Metals) price change was +0.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +10.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +21.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +85.45%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+10.72% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LMEFF($57.1M) has a higher market cap than KSSRF($8.4M). KSSRF YTD gains are higher at: 188.577 vs. LMEFF (-25.433). KSSRF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -606.73K vs. LMEFF (-5.09M). LMEFF has more cash in the bank: 5.63M vs. KSSRF (582K). KSSRF (0) and LMEFF (0) have equivalent revenues.
KSSRFLMEFFKSSRF / LMEFF
Capitalization8.4M57.1M15%
EBITDA-606.73K-5.09M12%
Gain YTD188.577-25.433-741%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash582K5.63M10%
Total Debt145KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KSSRF vs LMEFF: Fundamental Ratings
KSSRF
LMEFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
65
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10090
SMR RATING
1..100
9298
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3662
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LMEFF's Valuation (65) in the null industry is in the same range as KSSRF (92). This means that LMEFF’s stock grew similarly to KSSRF’s over the last 12 months.

LMEFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as KSSRF (100). This means that LMEFF’s stock grew similarly to KSSRF’s over the last 12 months.

KSSRF's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as LMEFF (98). This means that KSSRF’s stock grew similarly to LMEFF’s over the last 12 months.

KSSRF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as LMEFF (62). This means that KSSRF’s stock grew similarly to LMEFF’s over the last 12 months.

KSSRF's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LMEFF (100). This means that KSSRF’s stock grew significantly faster than LMEFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KSSRFLMEFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KSSRF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
LMEFF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CHSYF1.35N/A
N/A
China Medical System Holdings Ltd
HBSI43.35N/A
N/A
Highlands Bankshares, Inc.
REPYY18.69N/A
N/A
Repsol S.A.
RTGC0.50N/A
N/A
Ridder Titan Genesis Corp.
CBLNF29.46N/A
N/A
Mersen

KSSRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KSSRF and STBMF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KSSRF and STBMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KSSRF
1D Price
Change %
KSSRF100%
N/A
STBMF - KSSRF
27%
Poorly correlated
+17.74%
NG - KSSRF
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.49%
LOMLF - KSSRF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.96%
IAUX - KSSRF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ORLA - KSSRF
7%
Poorly correlated
-1.22%
More

LMEFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LMEFF and KSSRF have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LMEFF and KSSRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LMEFF
1D Price
Change %
LMEFF100%
N/A
KSSRF - LMEFF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LGDTF - LMEFF
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.83%
KSKGF - LMEFF
-2%
Poorly correlated
+1.51%
KTGDF - LMEFF
-2%
Poorly correlated
+0.76%
KOREF - LMEFF
-6%
Poorly correlated
+0.83%