KSPHF
Price
$30.28
Change
+$3.15 (+11.61%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
1.14B
MILFF
Price
$0.40
Change
-$0.02 (-4.76%)
Updated
Oct 16 closing price
Capitalization
38.14M
Interact to see
Advertisement

KSPHF vs MILFF

Header iconKSPHF vs MILFF Comparison
Open Charts KSPHF vs MILFFBanner chart's image
Kissei Pharmaceutical
Price$30.28
Change+$3.15 (+11.61%)
Volume$100
Capitalization1.14B
1CM
Price$0.40
Change-$0.02 (-4.76%)
Volume$500
Capitalization38.14M
KSPHF vs MILFF Comparison Chart in %
MILFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KSPHF vs. MILFF commentary
Oct 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KSPHF is a Hold and MILFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2025
Stock price -- (KSPHF: $30.28 vs. MILFF: $0.40)
Brand notoriety: KSPHF and MILFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pharmaceuticals: Generic industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KSPHF: 100% vs. MILFF: 115%
Market capitalization -- KSPHF: $1.14B vs. MILFF: $38.14M
KSPHF [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] is valued at $1.14B. MILFF’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] market capitalization is $38.14M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] industry ranges from $63.85B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] industry is $3.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KSPHF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMILFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • KSPHF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • MILFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, KSPHF is a better buy in the long-term than MILFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MILFF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MILFF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

KSPHF (@Pharmaceuticals: Generic) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MILFF (@Pharmaceuticals: Generic) price change was +42.41% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Generic industry was +0.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was +51.45%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pharmaceuticals: Generic (+0.79% weekly)

A generic drug contains the same chemical substance as a drug that was originally protected by patents. Generic drugs are generally sold at cheaper price points, compared to name-brand pharmaceuticals, after patents for the more expensive drugs lapse. The generic drug industry has created a major market, thanks to the lower pricing. According to the Center for Justice and Democracy at New York Law School, 80 percent of all drugs prescribed are generic, and generic drugs are chosen 94 percent of the time when they are available. But their manufacturers must be able to prove to the FDA that they can be effective substitutes for the original drugs. Some of the major generic drug makers include Zoetis, Inc., Allergan plc and Mylan N.V.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KSPHF($1.14B) has a higher market cap than MILFF($38.1M). MILFF has higher P/E ratio than KSPHF: MILFF (28.05) vs KSPHF (16.67). MILFF YTD gains are higher at: 110.765 vs. KSPHF (21.120). KSPHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 18.6B vs. MILFF (4.15M). KSPHF has more cash in the bank: 50B vs. MILFF (5.86M). MILFF has less debt than KSPHF: MILFF (7.57M) vs KSPHF (1.26B). KSPHF has higher revenues than MILFF: KSPHF (81.1B) vs MILFF (70.3M).
KSPHFMILFFKSPHF / MILFF
Capitalization1.14B38.1M2,987%
EBITDA18.6B4.15M448,733%
Gain YTD21.120110.76519%
P/E Ratio16.6728.0559%
Revenue81.1B70.3M115,363%
Total Cash50B5.86M852,951%
Total Debt1.26B7.57M16,649%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KSPHF vs MILFF: Fundamental Ratings
KSPHF
MILFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4494
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
60
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2785
SMR RATING
1..100
8482
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4736
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3044
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KSPHF's Valuation (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MILFF (60). This means that KSPHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MILFF’s over the last 12 months.

KSPHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (27) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MILFF (85). This means that KSPHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MILFF’s over the last 12 months.

MILFF's SMR Rating (82) in the null industry is in the same range as KSPHF (84). This means that MILFF’s stock grew similarly to KSPHF’s over the last 12 months.

MILFF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as KSPHF (47). This means that MILFF’s stock grew similarly to KSPHF’s over the last 12 months.

KSPHF's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the null industry is in the same range as MILFF (44). This means that KSPHF’s stock grew similarly to MILFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KSPHFMILFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
24%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
23%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MILFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FRBSX36.450.23
+0.64%
Franklin Mutual U.S. Mid Cap Value A
WEQCX10.190.06
+0.59%
TETON Westwood Equity C
SAPYX38.750.22
+0.57%
ClearBridge Appreciation I
PCVCX9.49-0.01
-0.11%
Virtus NFJ Small-Cap Value C
FTPSX100.90-0.51
-0.50%
Invesco Technology R6

KSPHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KSPHF and LVRLF have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KSPHF and LVRLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KSPHF
1D Price
Change %
KSPHF100%
N/A
LVRLF - KSPHF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
INDV - KSPHF
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.85%
MILFF - KSPHF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HSTI - KSPHF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HTSUF - KSPHF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MILFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MILFF and JUSHF have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MILFF and JUSHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MILFF
1D Price
Change %
MILFF100%
N/A
JUSHF - MILFF
7%
Poorly correlated
-4.46%
INDV - MILFF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.85%
KHTRF - MILFF
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.95%
IPSEY - MILFF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.73%
KSPHF - MILFF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More