KSKGF
Price
$1.40
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 17 closing price
Capitalization
213.73M
MISVF
Price
$0.17
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
8.29M
Interact to see
Advertisement

KSKGF vs MISVF

Header iconKSKGF vs MISVF Comparison
Open Charts KSKGF vs MISVFBanner chart's image
Kingsgate Consolidated
Price$1.40
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$875
Capitalization213.73M
Minco Silver
Price$0.17
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.5K
Capitalization8.29M
KSKGF vs MISVF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
KSKGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MISVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KSKGF vs. MISVF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KSKGF is a Hold and MISVF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (KSKGF: $1.40 vs. MISVF: $0.17)
Brand notoriety: KSKGF and MISVF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KSKGF: 10% vs. MISVF: 11%
Market capitalization -- KSKGF: $213.73M vs. MISVF: $8.29M
KSKGF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $213.73M. MISVF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $8.29M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KSKGF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMISVF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • KSKGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MISVF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, KSKGF is a better buy in the long-term than MISVF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KSKGF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MISVF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KSKGF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • MISVF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both KSKGF and MISVF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

KSKGF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MISVF (@Precious Metals) price change was +3.84% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.26%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.06% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KSKGF($214M) has a higher market cap than MISVF($8.29M). KSKGF YTD gains are higher at: 77.215 vs. MISVF (27.000). MISVF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.45M vs. KSKGF (-32.95M). MISVF has more cash in the bank: 43.3M vs. KSKGF (15.6M). MISVF has less debt than KSKGF: MISVF (947K) vs KSKGF (12.7M). KSKGF has higher revenues than MISVF: KSKGF (176M) vs MISVF (0).
KSKGFMISVFKSKGF / MISVF
Capitalization214M8.29M2,582%
EBITDA-32.95M4.45M-741%
Gain YTD77.21527.000286%
P/E RatioN/A3.74-
Revenue176M0-
Total Cash15.6M43.3M36%
Total Debt12.7M947K1,341%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KSKGF vs MISVF: Fundamental Ratings
KSKGF
MISVF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
47
Fair valued
54
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
37100
SMR RATING
1..100
1280
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3845
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10045
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KSKGF's Valuation (47) in the null industry is in the same range as MISVF (54). This means that KSKGF’s stock grew similarly to MISVF’s over the last 12 months.

KSKGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MISVF (100). This means that KSKGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MISVF’s over the last 12 months.

KSKGF's SMR Rating (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MISVF (80). This means that KSKGF’s stock grew significantly faster than MISVF’s over the last 12 months.

KSKGF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as MISVF (45). This means that KSKGF’s stock grew similarly to MISVF’s over the last 12 months.

MISVF's P/E Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KSKGF (100). This means that MISVF’s stock grew somewhat faster than KSKGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KSKGFMISVF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KSKGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MISVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XISHY6.150.38
+6.59%
Xinyi Solar Holdings Limited
FNCSF5.100.15
+3.03%
North American Financial 15 Split Corp
SOOBF42.10N/A
N/A
Sapporo Holdings, Ltd.
FSDK63.00N/A
N/A
First Citizens National Bank of Upper Sandusky (The) (OH)
RDGMF0.14N/A
-1.77%
RIDGELINE MINERALS CORP.

KSKGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KSKGF and GRYCF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KSKGF and GRYCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KSKGF
1D Price
Change %
KSKGF100%
N/A
GRYCF - KSKGF
24%
Poorly correlated
+5.59%
BTLLF - KSKGF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CCHI - KSKGF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FSXLF - KSKGF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.09%
MISVF - KSKGF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MISVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MISVF and AUCCF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MISVF and AUCCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MISVF
1D Price
Change %
MISVF100%
N/A
AUCCF - MISVF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ZCTSF - MISVF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CCHI - MISVF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CRTIF - MISVF
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.41%
KSKGF - MISVF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More