KRUS
Price
$85.07
Change
+$0.26 (+0.31%)
Updated
Sep 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.03B
64 days until earnings call
SHAK
Price
$105.59
Change
-$0.41 (-0.39%)
Updated
Sep 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.27B
58 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

KRUS vs SHAK

Header iconKRUS vs SHAK Comparison
Open Charts KRUS vs SHAKBanner chart's image
Kura Sushi USA
Price$85.07
Change+$0.26 (+0.31%)
Volume$1.4K
Capitalization1.03B
Shake Shack
Price$105.59
Change-$0.41 (-0.39%)
Volume$7.99K
Capitalization4.27B
KRUS vs SHAK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
KRUS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SHAK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KRUS vs. SHAK commentary
Sep 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KRUS is a StrongBuy and SHAK is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 03, 2025
Stock price -- (KRUS: $84.81 vs. SHAK: $106.00)
Brand notoriety: KRUS: Not notable vs. SHAK: Notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KRUS: 64% vs. SHAK: 72%
Market capitalization -- KRUS: $1.03B vs. SHAK: $4.27B
KRUS [@Restaurants] is valued at $1.03B. SHAK’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $4.27B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $223.74B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KRUS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSHAK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • KRUS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SHAK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, KRUS is a better buy in the long-term than SHAK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KRUS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SHAK’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KRUS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SHAK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KRUS is a better buy in the short-term than SHAK.

Price Growth

KRUS (@Restaurants) experienced а +5.77% price change this week, while SHAK (@Restaurants) price change was +1.94% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.05%.

Reported Earning Dates

KRUS is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

SHAK is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-0.49% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHAK($4.27B) has a higher market cap than KRUS($1.03B). KRUS has higher P/E ratio than SHAK: KRUS (292.35) vs SHAK (225.53). KRUS YTD gains are higher at: -6.376 vs. SHAK (-18.336). SHAK has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 137M vs. KRUS (4.17M). SHAK has more cash in the bank: 337M vs. KRUS (60M). KRUS has less debt than SHAK: KRUS (166M) vs SHAK (838M). SHAK has higher revenues than KRUS: SHAK (1.32B) vs KRUS (269M).
KRUSSHAKKRUS / SHAK
Capitalization1.03B4.27B24%
EBITDA4.17M137M3%
Gain YTD-6.376-18.33635%
P/E Ratio292.35225.53130%
Revenue269M1.32B20%
Total Cash60M337M18%
Total Debt166M838M20%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KRUS vs SHAK: Fundamental Ratings
KRUS
SHAK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4660
SMR RATING
1..100
9387
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4565
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10018
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SHAK's Valuation (96) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as KRUS (100) in the null industry. This means that SHAK’s stock grew similarly to KRUS’s over the last 12 months.

KRUS's Profit vs Risk Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as SHAK (60) in the Restaurants industry. This means that KRUS’s stock grew similarly to SHAK’s over the last 12 months.

SHAK's SMR Rating (87) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as KRUS (93) in the null industry. This means that SHAK’s stock grew similarly to KRUS’s over the last 12 months.

KRUS's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as SHAK (65) in the Restaurants industry. This means that KRUS’s stock grew similarly to SHAK’s over the last 12 months.

SHAK's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for KRUS (100) in the null industry. This means that SHAK’s stock grew significantly faster than KRUS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KRUSSHAK
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KRUS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SHAK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JIREX12.310.06
+0.49%
JHancock Real Estate Securities 1
NPNRX49.920.06
+0.12%
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Value R3
MSJAX19.35-0.04
-0.21%
Morgan Stanley Global Endurance A
TSRMX16.42-0.07
-0.42%
Touchstone Sands Cptl Emerg Mkts Gr R6
SSTFX11.36-0.10
-0.87%
Virtus KAR Capital Growth C

KRUS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KRUS has been loosely correlated with CAKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KRUS jumps, then CAKE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KRUS
1D Price
Change %
KRUS100%
+2.10%
CAKE - KRUS
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.93%
RICK - KRUS
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.40%
TXRH - KRUS
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.10%
BJRI - KRUS
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.39%
SHAK - KRUS
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.08%
More

SHAK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SHAK has been loosely correlated with CAKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SHAK jumps, then CAKE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHAK
1D Price
Change %
SHAK100%
+0.08%
CAKE - SHAK
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.93%
EAT - SHAK
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.29%
CAVA - SHAK
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.97%
TXRH - SHAK
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.10%
KRUS - SHAK
51%
Loosely correlated
+2.10%
More