KRUS
Price
$47.66
Change
+$0.05 (+0.11%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
577.23M
60 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SG
Price
$5.94
Change
+$0.57 (+10.61%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
703.14M
104 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

KRUS vs SG

Header iconKRUS vs SG Comparison
Open Charts KRUS vs SGBanner chart's image
Kura Sushi USA
Price$47.66
Change+$0.05 (+0.11%)
Volume$328.43K
Capitalization577.23M
Sweetgreen
Price$5.94
Change+$0.57 (+10.61%)
Volume$12.3M
Capitalization703.14M
KRUS vs SG Comparison Chart in %
KRUS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KRUS vs. SG commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KRUS is a Hold and SG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (KRUS: $47.66 vs. SG: $5.94)
Brand notoriety: KRUS and SG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KRUS: 109% vs. SG: 195%
Market capitalization -- KRUS: $577.23M vs. SG: $703.14M
KRUS [@Restaurants] is valued at $577.23M. SG’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $703.14M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $219.04B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KRUS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • KRUS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both KRUS and SG are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KRUS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KRUS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SG is a better buy in the short-term than KRUS.

Price Growth

KRUS (@Restaurants) experienced а -12.92% price change this week, while SG (@Restaurants) price change was -4.96% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was -13.52%.

Reported Earning Dates

KRUS is expected to report earnings on Jan 13, 2026.

SG is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-0.58% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SG($703M) has a higher market cap than KRUS($577M). KRUS YTD gains are higher at: -47.439 vs. SG (-83.250). KRUS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.17M vs. SG (-29.06M). SG has more cash in the bank: 168M vs. KRUS (60M). KRUS has less debt than SG: KRUS (166M) vs SG (339M). SG has higher revenues than KRUS: SG (686M) vs KRUS (269M).
KRUSSGKRUS / SG
Capitalization577M703M82%
EBITDA4.17M-29.06M-14%
Gain YTD-47.439-83.25057%
P/E Ratio292.35N/A-
Revenue269M686M39%
Total Cash60M168M36%
Total Debt166M339M49%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KRUS vs SG: Fundamental Ratings
KRUS
SG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
553
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
100
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
71100
SMR RATING
1..100
9295
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9096
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9966
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
27n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KRUS's Valuation (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SG (100) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that KRUS’s stock grew similarly to SG’s over the last 12 months.

KRUS's Profit vs Risk Rating (71) in the null industry is in the same range as SG (100) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that KRUS’s stock grew similarly to SG’s over the last 12 months.

KRUS's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as SG (95) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that KRUS’s stock grew similarly to SG’s over the last 12 months.

KRUS's Price Growth Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as SG (96) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that KRUS’s stock grew similarly to SG’s over the last 12 months.

SG's P/E Growth Rating (66) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KRUS (99) in the null industry. This means that SG’s stock grew somewhat faster than KRUS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KRUSSG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KRUS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RYMDX137.620.69
+0.50%
Rydex Mid-Cap 1.5x Strategy H
TRZKX77.530.36
+0.47%
T. Rowe Price International Discovery Z
IGHSX11.910.05
+0.42%
Voya Global High Dividend Low Vol Port S
FBCVX25.60N/A
N/A
Fidelity Blue Chip Value
OMSOX31.86-0.06
-0.19%
Invesco Main Street All Cap A

KRUS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KRUS has been loosely correlated with CAKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KRUS jumps, then CAKE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KRUS
1D Price
Change %
KRUS100%
+3.84%
CAKE - KRUS
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.31%
SHAK - KRUS
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.42%
FWRG - KRUS
50%
Loosely correlated
-2.36%
BJRI - KRUS
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.60%
DIN - KRUS
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.16%
More

SG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SG has been loosely correlated with CAVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SG jumps, then CAVA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SG
1D Price
Change %
SG100%
+2.68%
CAVA - SG
54%
Loosely correlated
-1.02%
CMG - SG
52%
Loosely correlated
+5.07%
FRSH - SG
48%
Loosely correlated
N/A
KRUS - SG
47%
Loosely correlated
+3.84%
SHAK - SG
40%
Loosely correlated
+1.42%
More