KRUS
Price
$79.62
Change
+$3.17 (+4.15%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
962.92M
108 days until earnings call
SG
Price
$14.31
Change
+$0.72 (+5.30%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
1.68B
18 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

KRUS vs SG

Header iconKRUS vs SG Comparison
Open Charts KRUS vs SGBanner chart's image
Kura Sushi USA
Price$79.62
Change+$3.17 (+4.15%)
Volume$230.63K
Capitalization962.92M
Sweetgreen
Price$14.31
Change+$0.72 (+5.30%)
Volume$5.42M
Capitalization1.68B
KRUS vs SG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
KRUS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KRUS vs. SG commentary
Jul 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KRUS is a Hold and SG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 20, 2025
Stock price -- (KRUS: $79.62 vs. SG: $14.31)
Brand notoriety: KRUS and SG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KRUS: 75% vs. SG: 113%
Market capitalization -- KRUS: $962.92M vs. SG: $1.68B
KRUS [@Restaurants] is valued at $962.92M. SG’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $1.68B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $212.41B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.17B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KRUS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • KRUS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, KRUS is a better buy in the long-term than SG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KRUS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SG’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KRUS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both KRUS and SG are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

KRUS (@Restaurants) experienced а +8.21% price change this week, while SG (@Restaurants) price change was +4.91% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.85%.

Reported Earning Dates

KRUS is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

SG is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-0.89% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SG($1.68B) has a higher market cap than KRUS($963M). KRUS YTD gains are higher at: -12.100 vs. SG (-55.365). KRUS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.17M vs. SG (-21.47M). SG has more cash in the bank: 184M vs. KRUS (60M). KRUS has less debt than SG: KRUS (166M) vs SG (329M). SG has higher revenues than KRUS: SG (685M) vs KRUS (269M).
KRUSSGKRUS / SG
Capitalization963M1.68B57%
EBITDA4.17M-21.47M-19%
Gain YTD-12.100-55.36522%
P/E Ratio292.35N/A-
Revenue269M685M39%
Total Cash60M184M33%
Total Debt166M329M50%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KRUS vs SG: Fundamental Ratings
KRUS
SG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7167
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
99
Overvalued
100
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4984
SMR RATING
1..100
9194
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4364
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10073
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a8

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KRUS's Valuation (99) in the null industry is in the same range as SG (100) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that KRUS’s stock grew similarly to SG’s over the last 12 months.

KRUS's Profit vs Risk Rating (49) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SG (84) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that KRUS’s stock grew somewhat faster than SG’s over the last 12 months.

KRUS's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as SG (94) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that KRUS’s stock grew similarly to SG’s over the last 12 months.

KRUS's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as SG (64) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that KRUS’s stock grew similarly to SG’s over the last 12 months.

SG's P/E Growth Rating (73) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as KRUS (100) in the null industry. This means that SG’s stock grew similarly to KRUS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KRUSSG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KRUS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JAAGX81.140.06
+0.07%
Janus Henderson VIT Enterprise Instl
OAKLX82.46-0.09
-0.11%
Oakmark Select Investor
GINNX63.24-0.32
-0.50%
Guinness Atkinson™ Global Inntrs Instl
WSMGX20.18-0.12
-0.59%
Wilshire Small Company Growth Instl
WGMCX31.23-0.19
-0.60%
Wasatch Ultra Growth Institutional

KRUS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KRUS has been loosely correlated with CAKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KRUS jumps, then CAKE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KRUS
1D Price
Change %
KRUS100%
+4.15%
CAKE - KRUS
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.24%
TXRH - KRUS
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.82%
RICK - KRUS
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.48%
SHAK - KRUS
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.05%
FWRG - KRUS
50%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More

SG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SG has been loosely correlated with CAVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SG jumps, then CAVA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SG
1D Price
Change %
SG100%
+5.30%
CAVA - SG
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.66%
CMG - SG
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.73%
KRUS - SG
42%
Loosely correlated
+4.15%
SHAK - SG
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.05%
PTLO - SG
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.18%
More