KROEF
Price
$0.50
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
100.15M
WT
Price
$13.43
Change
-$0.31 (-2.26%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
1.98B
46 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

KROEF vs WT

Header iconKROEF vs WT Comparison
Open Charts KROEF vs WTBanner chart's image
KR1
Price$0.50
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$10K
Capitalization100.15M
WisdomTree
Price$13.43
Change-$0.31 (-2.26%)
Volume$4.9M
Capitalization1.98B
KROEF vs WT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
KROEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KROEF vs. WT commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KROEF is a Hold and WT is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (KROEF: $0.50 vs. WT: $13.43)
Brand notoriety: KROEF: Not notable vs. WT: Notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KROEF: 30% vs. WT: 140%
Market capitalization -- KROEF: $100.15M vs. WT: $1.98B
KROEF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $100.15M. WT’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $1.98B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $170.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.56B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KROEF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWT’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • KROEF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WT’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, WT is a better buy in the long-term than KROEF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KROEF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WT’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KROEF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both KROEF and WT are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

KROEF (@Investment Managers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while WT (@Investment Managers) price change was -1.32% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +38.68%.

Reported Earning Dates

WT is expected to report earnings on Oct 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.32% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WT($1.98B) has a higher market cap than KROEF($100M). WT has higher P/E ratio than KROEF: WT (32.76) vs KROEF (8.39). WT YTD gains are higher at: 28.990 vs. KROEF (-28.643).
KROEFWTKROEF / WT
Capitalization100M1.98B5%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-28.64328.990-99%
P/E Ratio8.3932.7626%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/A106M-
Total DebtN/A515M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
WT: Fundamental Ratings
WT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
89
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
19
SMR RATING
1..100
59
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
40
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
13
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KROEFWT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KROEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NEXCF0.08N/A
N/A
NexTech3D.AI Corp.
KGMEF26.50N/A
N/A
Kagome Co., Ltd.
FRACF1.38N/A
N/A
Foraco International, Marseille
IDCBF0.75N/A
N/A
Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Ltd.
KKOYF20.42N/A
N/A
Kesko OY

KROEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KROEF and WT have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KROEF and WT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KROEF
1D Price
Change %
KROEF100%
N/A
WT - KROEF
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.26%
WHF - KROEF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.81%
BBXIA - KROEF
18%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BBXIB - KROEF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FSEN - KROEF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

WT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WT has been closely correlated with JHG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WT jumps, then JHG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WT
1D Price
Change %
WT100%
-2.26%
JHG - WT
70%
Closely correlated
-1.82%
KKR - WT
68%
Closely correlated
-1.33%
AMP - WT
66%
Closely correlated
-4.42%
EQH - WT
66%
Loosely correlated
-1.29%
CG - WT
66%
Loosely correlated
-1.82%
More