KROEF
Price
$0.45
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
71.81M
WHF
Price
$9.13
Change
+$0.10 (+1.11%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
283.1M
31 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

KROEF vs WHF

Header iconKROEF vs WHF Comparison
Open Charts KROEF vs WHFBanner chart's image
KR1
Price$0.45
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$10.83K
Capitalization71.81M
WhiteHorse Finance
Price$9.13
Change+$0.10 (+1.11%)
Volume$147.57K
Capitalization283.1M
KROEF vs WHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
KROEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KROEF vs. WHF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KROEF is a Hold and WHF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (KROEF: $0.45 vs. WHF: $9.13)
Brand notoriety: KROEF and WHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KROEF: 159% vs. WHF: 175%
Market capitalization -- KROEF: $71.81M vs. WHF: $283.1M
KROEF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $71.81M. WHF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $283.1M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KROEF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWHF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • KROEF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, WHF is a better buy in the long-term than KROEF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KROEF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WHF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KROEF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • WHF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WHF is a better buy in the short-term than KROEF.

Price Growth

KROEF (@Investment Managers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while WHF (@Investment Managers) price change was +5.06% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.30%.

Reported Earning Dates

WHF is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.13% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WHF($283M) has a higher market cap than KROEF($71.8M). WHF has higher P/E ratio than KROEF: WHF (13.84) vs KROEF (5.61). WHF YTD gains are higher at: 2.134 vs. KROEF (-35.357). WHF has higher revenues than KROEF: WHF (25.7M) vs KROEF (3.7M).
KROEFWHFKROEF / WHF
Capitalization71.8M283M25%
EBITDA-1.1MN/A-
Gain YTD-35.3572.134-1,657%
P/E Ratio5.6113.8441%
Revenue3.7M25.7M14%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A386M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
WHF: Fundamental Ratings
WHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
2
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
34
SMR RATING
1..100
61
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
57
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
16
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KROEFWHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
48%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
48%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KROEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AILQF0.24N/A
N/A
AirIQ Inc.
ASGLF30.00N/A
N/A
AGC Inc.
BTGGF63.22N/A
N/A
Bitcoin Group SE
TAVHF5.64N/A
N/A
Tav Havalimanlari Holding AS
CIHKY33.16-1.20
-3.49%
China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd.

KROEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KROEF and WT have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KROEF and WT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KROEF
1D Price
Change %
KROEF100%
N/A
WT - KROEF
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.88%
WHF - KROEF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.11%
BBXIA - KROEF
18%
Poorly correlated
+3.03%
BBXIB - KROEF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FSEN - KROEF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

WHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WHF has been loosely correlated with PSEC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WHF jumps, then PSEC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WHF
1D Price
Change %
WHF100%
+1.11%
PSEC - WHF
45%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BCSF - WHF
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.66%
CGBD - WHF
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.72%
FDUS - WHF
43%
Loosely correlated
+1.07%
GBDC - WHF
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.68%
More