KRNGF
Price
$1.10
Change
+$0.03 (+2.80%)
Updated
Jan 5 closing price
Capitalization
805.66M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MWCAF
Price
Loading...
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Loading...
Capitalization
7.17M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

KRNGF vs MWCAF

Header iconKRNGF vs MWCAF Comparison
Open Charts KRNGF vs MWCAFBanner chart's image
KAROON ENERGY
Price$1.10
Change+$0.03 (+2.80%)
Volume$4.3K
Capitalization805.66M
Matachewan Consolidated Mines
PriceLoading...
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$3.5K
Capitalization7.17M
KRNGF vs MWCAF Comparison Chart in %
KRNGF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KRNGF vs. MWCAF commentary
Jan 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KRNGF is a Hold and MWCAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 15, 2026
Stock price -- (KRNGF: $1.10 vs. MWCAF: $0.55)
Brand notoriety: KRNGF and MWCAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KRNGF: 268% vs. MWCAF: 100%
Market capitalization -- KRNGF: $805.66M vs. MWCAF: $7.17M
KRNGF [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $805.66M. MWCAF’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $7.17M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $123.99B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $3.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KRNGF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMWCAF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • KRNGF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MWCAF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, MWCAF is a better buy in the long-term than KRNGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KRNGF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • KRNGF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

KRNGF (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MWCAF (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +5.90%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.56%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (+5.90% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KRNGF($806M) has a higher market cap than MWCAF($7.17M). KRNGF has higher P/E ratio than MWCAF: KRNGF (6.24) vs MWCAF (2.25). KRNGF YTD gains are higher at: 2.804 vs. MWCAF (0.000). KRNGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 467M vs. MWCAF (1.46M). KRNGF has more cash in the bank: 341M vs. MWCAF (12.8M). MWCAF has less debt than KRNGF: MWCAF (0) vs KRNGF (511M). KRNGF has higher revenues than MWCAF: KRNGF (675M) vs MWCAF (2.78M).
KRNGFMWCAFKRNGF / MWCAF
Capitalization806M7.17M11,243%
EBITDA467M1.46M32,074%
Gain YTD2.8040.000-
P/E Ratio6.242.25278%
Revenue675M2.78M24,263%
Total Cash341M12.8M2,664%
Total Debt511M0-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KRNGF vs MWCAF: Fundamental Ratings
KRNGF
MWCAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3842
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
21
Undervalued
44
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7515
SMR RATING
1..100
7922
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5335
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
823
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5065

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KRNGF's Valuation (21) in the null industry is in the same range as MWCAF (44). This means that KRNGF’s stock grew similarly to MWCAF’s over the last 12 months.

MWCAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KRNGF (75). This means that MWCAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than KRNGF’s over the last 12 months.

MWCAF's SMR Rating (22) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KRNGF (79). This means that MWCAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than KRNGF’s over the last 12 months.

MWCAF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as KRNGF (53). This means that MWCAF’s stock grew similarly to KRNGF’s over the last 12 months.

KRNGF's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the null industry is in the same range as MWCAF (23). This means that KRNGF’s stock grew similarly to MWCAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KRNGFMWCAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
15%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
15%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KRNGF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ADM64.601.22
+1.92%
Archer Daniels Midland Company
GSUN1.400.01
+0.72%
Golden Sun Health Technology Group Limited
SANG4.92N/A
N/A
Sangoma Technologies Corp
BLDP2.75-0.02
-0.72%
Ballard Power Systems
SIMO111.74-1.82
-1.60%
Silicon Motion Technology Corp

KRNGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KRNGF and JRNGF have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KRNGF and JRNGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KRNGF
1D Price
Change %
KRNGF100%
N/A
JRNGF - KRNGF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.43%
MWCAF - KRNGF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LEKOF - KRNGF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MTLRF - KRNGF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MEGEF - KRNGF
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MWCAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MWCAF and FANG have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MWCAF and FANG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MWCAF
1D Price
Change %
MWCAF100%
N/A
FANG - MWCAF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.67%
TTGXF - MWCAF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EERGF - MWCAF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MEGEF - MWCAF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NUVSF - MWCAF
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.27%
More