KRMKF vs MTMV
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KRMKF is a Hold and MTMV is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
KRMKF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMTMV’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- KRMKF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- MTMV’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Price Growth
KRMKF (@Electronic Equipment/Instruments) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MTMV (@Electronic Equipment/Instruments) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Equipment/Instruments industry was -5.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.21%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electronic Equipment/Instruments (-5.22% weekly)This industry manufactures electronic products used in various critical and sophisticated technologies, including laser-based systems, circuit and continuity testers, electro-optical measuring instruments and high-speed precision weighing and inspection equipment. Some major companies operating in this business are Canon Inc., Keysight Technologies Inc., and Fortive Corp.
| KRMKF | MTMV | KRMKF / MTMV | |
| Capitalization | 51M | 39.7M | 128% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | -56.000 | - |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | N/A | - |
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
KRMKF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KRMKF has been loosely correlated with VPIM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KRMKF jumps, then VPIM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KRMKF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KRMKF | 100% | N/A | ||
| VPIM - KRMKF | 33% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| QURT - KRMKF | 27% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SVRE - KRMKF | 2% Poorly correlated | -5.69% | ||
| MTMV - KRMKF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ODYS - KRMKF | -1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
MTMV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MTMV and SEPJF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MTMV and SEPJF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MTMV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTMV | 100% | N/A | ||
| SEPJF - MTMV | 29% Poorly correlated | -2.82% | ||
| NSCIF - MTMV | 26% Poorly correlated | +5.62% | ||
| ODYS - MTMV | 6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SVRE - MTMV | 2% Poorly correlated | -5.69% | ||
| CPTN - MTMV | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||