KR
Price
$64.17
Change
-$3.39 (-5.02%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
40.61B
29 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SFM
Price
$68.11
Change
-$35.94 (-34.54%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
6.63B
15 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

KR vs SFM

Header iconKR vs SFM Comparison
Open Charts KR vs SFMBanner chart's image
Kroger Co (The)
Price$64.17
Change-$3.39 (-5.02%)
Volume$6.1M
Capitalization40.61B
Sprouts Farmers Market
Price$68.11
Change-$35.94 (-34.54%)
Volume$4.07M
Capitalization6.63B
KR vs SFM Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KR vs. SFM commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KR is a Buy and SFM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (KR: $64.17 vs. SFM: $68.11)
Brand notoriety: KR: Notable vs. SFM: Not notable
Both companies represent the Food Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KR: 90% vs. SFM: 162%
Market capitalization -- KR: $40.61B vs. SFM: $6.63B
KR [@Food Retail] is valued at $40.61B. SFM’s [@Food Retail] market capitalization is $6.63B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food Retail] industry ranges from $56.54B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food Retail] industry is $12.63B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KR’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSFM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • KR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SFM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, KR is a better buy in the long-term than SFM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KR’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SFM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KR’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • SFM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KR is a better buy in the short-term than SFM.

Price Growth

KR (@Food Retail) experienced а +3.32% price change this week, while SFM (@Food Retail) price change was -3.92% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food Retail industry was +1.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.62%.

Reported Earning Dates

KR is expected to report earnings on Mar 05, 2026.

SFM is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food Retail (+1.25% weekly)

The food retail industry includes companies that sell food, beverage and household products. Items sold include grocery, gourmet food, fresh produce, and frozen food. Kroger Co., George Weston Ltd., Grocery Outlet Holding Corp., and Sprouts Farmers Markets, Inc. are examples of major food retailers. While e-commerce companies like Amazon have increasingly been ramping-up offerings in the food retail space, several traditional players have also been expanding their online presence to stand their ground against rising competition.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KR($40.6B) has a higher market cap than SFM($6.63B). KR has higher P/E ratio than SFM: KR (56.79) vs SFM (13.20). KR YTD gains are higher at: 2.705 vs. SFM (-14.510). KR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.43B vs. SFM (970M). KR has more cash in the bank: 5.07B vs. SFM (322M). SFM has less debt than KR: SFM (1.86B) vs KR (25.2B). KR has higher revenues than SFM: KR (147B) vs SFM (8.65B).
KRSFMKR / SFM
Capitalization40.6B6.63B612%
EBITDA5.43B970M559%
Gain YTD2.705-14.510-19%
P/E Ratio56.7913.20430%
Revenue147B8.65B1,699%
Total Cash5.07B322M1,574%
Total Debt25.2B1.86B1,356%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KR vs SFM: Fundamental Ratings
KR
SFM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6766
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
34
Fair valued
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2572
SMR RATING
1..100
7625
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6089
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
599
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7532

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KR's Valuation (34) in the Food Retail industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SFM (72). This means that KR’s stock grew somewhat faster than SFM’s over the last 12 months.

KR's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the Food Retail industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SFM (72). This means that KR’s stock grew somewhat faster than SFM’s over the last 12 months.

SFM's SMR Rating (25) in the Food Retail industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KR (76). This means that SFM’s stock grew somewhat faster than KR’s over the last 12 months.

KR's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Food Retail industry is in the same range as SFM (89). This means that KR’s stock grew similarly to SFM’s over the last 12 months.

KR's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Food Retail industry is significantly better than the same rating for SFM (99). This means that KR’s stock grew significantly faster than SFM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KRSFM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SFM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IENIX36.920.96
+2.67%
Invesco Energy R5
DMIDX28.080.05
+0.18%
BNY Mellon MidCap Index I
NSOPX18.52-0.12
-0.64%
North Star Opportunity A
RICBX62.44-0.71
-1.12%
American Funds Invmt Co of Amer R2
CGTUX114.50-2.99
-2.54%
Columbia Global Technology Growth Inst3

KR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KR has been loosely correlated with WMK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KR jumps, then WMK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KR
1D Price
Change %
KR100%
+1.76%
WMK - KR
40%
Loosely correlated
+1.14%
ACI - KR
40%
Loosely correlated
+3.50%
GO - KR
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.29%
ADRNY - KR
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.29%
NGVC - KR
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.32%
More

SFM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SFM has been loosely correlated with NGVC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SFM jumps, then NGVC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFM
1D Price
Change %
SFM100%
-2.13%
NGVC - SFM
48%
Loosely correlated
-1.32%
KR - SFM
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.76%
WMK - SFM
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.14%
VLGEA - SFM
22%
Poorly correlated
+4.60%
IMKTA - SFM
21%
Poorly correlated
+4.30%
More