It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
KO’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileKOF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
KO’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KOF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
KO (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а -1.10% price change this week, while KOF (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was -4.81% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was -1.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.92%.
KO is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2025.
KOF is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.
Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.
KO | KOF | KO / KOF | |
Capitalization | 264B | 20.5B | 1,288% |
EBITDA | 15.6B | 33.2B | 47% |
Gain YTD | 9.342 | -15.023 | -62% |
P/E Ratio | 24.57 | 17.19 | 143% |
Revenue | 45.8B | 242B | 19% |
Total Cash | 13.7B | 38.5B | 36% |
Total Debt | 42.1B | 68.4B | 62% |
KO | KOF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 55 | 65 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 30 Undervalued | 80 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 38 | 20 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 24 | 54 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 76 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | 3 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
KO's Valuation (30) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KOF (80). This means that KO’s stock grew somewhat faster than KOF’s over the last 12 months.
KOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as KO (38). This means that KOF’s stock grew similarly to KO’s over the last 12 months.
KO's SMR Rating (24) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as KOF (54). This means that KO’s stock grew similarly to KOF’s over the last 12 months.
KO's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as KOF (76). This means that KO’s stock grew similarly to KOF’s over the last 12 months.
KOF's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KO (52). This means that KOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than KO’s over the last 12 months.
KO | KOF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago60% | 2 days ago65% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago50% | 2 days ago70% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago39% | 7 days ago54% |
MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago38% | 2 days ago50% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago39% | 2 days ago56% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 8 days ago0% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago35% | 2 days ago53% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago52% | 2 days ago74% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago34% | 2 days ago60% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KO has been closely correlated with PEP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KO jumps, then PEP could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that KOF and CELH have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KOF and CELH's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KOF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
KOF | 100% | -2.77% | ||
CELH - KOF | 23% Poorly correlated | +0.30% | ||
OTLY - KOF | 20% Poorly correlated | -6.56% | ||
CCEP - KOF | 19% Poorly correlated | +1.37% | ||
COKE - KOF | 17% Poorly correlated | -0.44% | ||
PRMW - KOF | 16% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |