It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
KNAMF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePEGA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PEGA’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
KNAMF (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PEGA (@Packaged Software) price change was +2.83% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +4.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +17.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.09%.
PEGA is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2025.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
KNAMF | PEGA | KNAMF / PEGA | |
Capitalization | 7.67B | 5.42B | 141% |
EBITDA | 78B | 121M | 64,463% |
Gain YTD | 21.499 | 98.101 | 22% |
P/E Ratio | 30.03 | 85.82 | 35% |
Revenue | 311B | 1.43B | 21,703% |
Total Cash | 209B | 423M | 49,409% |
Total Debt | 59.8B | 581M | 10,293% |
KNAMF | PEGA | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 47 | 78 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 9 Undervalued | 75 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 42 | 79 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 66 | 24 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | 36 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 86 | 87 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
KNAMF's Valuation (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PEGA (75) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that KNAMF’s stock grew significantly faster than PEGA’s over the last 12 months.
KNAMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PEGA (79) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that KNAMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PEGA’s over the last 12 months.
PEGA's SMR Rating (24) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KNAMF (66) in the null industry. This means that PEGA’s stock grew somewhat faster than KNAMF’s over the last 12 months.
PEGA's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as KNAMF (53) in the null industry. This means that PEGA’s stock grew similarly to KNAMF’s over the last 12 months.
KNAMF's P/E Growth Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as PEGA (87) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that KNAMF’s stock grew similarly to PEGA’s over the last 12 months.
PEGA | |
---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago68% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago72% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago70% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago76% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago72% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago72% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago72% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago71% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago73% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago72% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KNAMF has been closely correlated with DTSS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KNAMF jumps, then DTSS could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KNAMF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
KNAMF | 100% | N/A | ||
DTSS - KNAMF | 78% Closely correlated | -3.64% | ||
PEGA - KNAMF | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.57% | ||
ELWS - KNAMF | 45% Loosely correlated | +16.97% | ||
NEXOY - KNAMF | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.99% | ||
LYFT - KNAMF | 41% Loosely correlated | -1.96% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PEGA has been loosely correlated with DTSS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PEGA jumps, then DTSS could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PEGA | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
PEGA | 100% | -0.57% | ||
DTSS - PEGA | 58% Loosely correlated | -3.64% | ||
KNAMF - PEGA | 57% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
FROG - PEGA | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.03% | ||
APPN - PEGA | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.46% | ||
SOUN - PEGA | 48% Loosely correlated | -1.52% | ||
More |